DOJ-OGR-00008451.jpg

550 KB
View Original

Extraction Summary

1
People
2
Organizations
0
Locations
1
Events
1
Relationships
1
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Legal document
File Size: 550 KB
Summary

This legal document, page 4 of a court filing from December 21, 2021, details a joint proposal by the prosecution ('the Government') and the defense regarding public access to trial exhibits. They propose releasing slides after closing arguments to balance the public's right to access with the defendant's right to a fair trial and victim privacy, citing the 'United States v. Graham' case. A footnote describes an alternative government proposal to provide redacted slides beforehand, which the defense opposes.

People (1)

Name Role Context
Graham Party in a cited legal case
Mentioned in the case citation 'United States v. Graham, 257 F.3d 143, 154 (2d Cir. 2001)'.

Organizations (2)

Name Type Context
United States Government Government agency
Referred to as 'the Government' and a party in the case 'United States v. Graham'. Proposes providing redacted slides...
United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit Judicial body
Referenced as '(2d Cir. 2001)' in a case citation.

Timeline (1 events)

A trial where parties are presenting closing arguments and discussing the timing of public release for trial exhibits (slides).
The parties the Government the defense

Relationships (1)

The Government Adversarial parties in a legal case The defense
The document states 'The parties jointly agree that this proposal appropriately balances...' but also notes in a footnote that 'The defense is opposed to' an alternative proposal from the Government.

Key Quotes (1)

"countervailing factors may overcome the presumption of access"
Source
— United States v. Graham case law (Cited as a legal principle to justify balancing the public's right of access against other interests, such as the defendant's right to a fair trial.)
DOJ-OGR-00008451.jpg
Quote #1

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document