DOJ-OGR-00021184.jpg
1.01 MB
Extraction Summary
3
People
3
Organizations
0
Locations
2
Events
2
Relationships
2
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal report / court filing (doj opr report excerpt)
File Size:
1.01 MB
Summary
This document is a page from a Department of Justice Office of Professional Responsibility (OPR) report (filed in court in 2021 and 2023). It outlines the scope of an investigation into DOJ attorneys regarding the Jeffrey Epstein case, specifically focusing on two issues: the negotiation of the Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) and the alleged failure to comply with the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA). Footnotes reveal that in December 2010, allegations were raised that Epstein exerted improper influence over the investigation and that the USAO deceived victims about the existence of the NPA.
People (3)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Jeffrey Epstein | Subject of Investigation |
Mentioned regarding the NPA, allegations of improper influence, and the deception of his victims.
|
| Unnamed Department Attorneys | Subjects of OPR Investigation |
Attorneys whose conduct regarding the NPA and CVRA compliance is being investigated for misconduct.
|
| Attorneys representing victims | Legal Representatives |
Raised allegations in December 2010 regarding Epstein's influence and USAO deception.
|
Organizations (3)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| OPR |
Office of Professional Responsibility; the body conducting the investigation into DOJ attorneys.
|
|
| Department / DOJ |
Department of Justice; the parent organization of the OPR and USAO.
|
|
| USAO |
United States Attorney's Office; investigated for its negotiation of the NPA and interactions with victims.
|
Timeline (2 events)
Relationships (2)
Negotiation of the Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA).
Investigation into USAO's interactions with victims and adherence to CVRA requirements.
Key Quotes (2)
"In this investigation, OPR considered two distinct sets of allegations. The first relates to the negotiation, execution, and implementation of the NPA. The second relates to the USAO’s interactions with Epstein’s victims and adherence to the requirements of the CVRA."Source
DOJ-OGR-00021184.jpg
Quote #1
"In December 2010, one of the attorneys representing victims in the CVRA litigation raised allegations that Epstein may have exerted improper influence over the federal criminal investigation and that the USAO had deceived the victims of Epstein’s crimes about the existence of the NPA."Source
DOJ-OGR-00021184.jpg
Quote #2
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document