DOJ-OGR-00021025.jpg
655 KB
Extraction Summary
7
People
2
Organizations
1
Locations
2
Events
5
Relationships
2
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal document
File Size:
655 KB
Summary
This legal document is a page from a court filing arguing against a defendant's claim of prejudice due to the death of potential witnesses. The prosecution contends that the defendant's assertions about what these witnesses (architects and a housekeeper) would have testified are speculative and unsubstantiated. It further argues that other witnesses, such as Juan Alessi, Larry Visoski, and David Rodgers, were available and did testify about similar matters, like renovations at Epstein's residences, meaning the information was obtainable through other means.
People (7)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Epstein |
Mentioned throughout as the individual whose residences, renovations, and private airplane are subjects of testimony.
|
|
| Defendant | Defendant |
The subject of the legal filing, who is arguing that the absence of deceased witnesses prejudiced her case. The docum...
|
| Juan Alessi | Witness |
Mentioned as a witness who testified at trial about working for Epstein.
|
| Larry Visoski | Witness |
Mentioned as a witness who testified at trial about working for Epstein.
|
| David Rodgers | Witness |
Mentioned as a witness who testified at trial about working for Epstein.
|
| King |
Named in the case citation 'United States v. King, 560 F.2d 122, 130 (2d Cir. 1977)'.
|
|
| Long |
Named in the case citation 'United States v. Long, 697 F. Supp. 651, 657 (S.D.N.Y. 1988)'.
|
Organizations (2)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| United States | government agency |
Party in the legal cases 'United States v. King' and 'United States v. Long'.
|
| DOJ-OGR | government agency |
Appears in the footer of the document (DOJ-OGR-00021025), likely a Department of Justice identifier.
|
Timeline (2 events)
A trial occurred where witnesses like Juan Alessi, Larry Visoski, and David Rodgers testified.
The Defendant claims two architect witnesses and a live-in housekeeper, who could have provided testimony, have died.
two architect witnesses
live-in housekeeper
Locations (1)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Location of Epstein's townhouse where the Defendant allegedly spent limited time.
|
Relationships (5)
The document states the Defendant claims she 'spent only limited time with Epstein at his townhouse in New York'.
The document states Juan Alessi was one of the individuals Epstein employed to work at his residences.
The document states Larry Visoski was one of the individuals Epstein employed to work at his residences.
The document states David Rodgers was one of the individuals Epstein employed to work at his residences.
The document refers to 'Epstein’s live-in housekeeper'.
Key Quotes (2)
"could have established"Source
— Defendant
(The Defendant's claim about what two deceased architect witnesses could have done regarding the timeline for Epstein's renovations.)
DOJ-OGR-00021025.jpg
Quote #1
"no way of knowing what [an absent witness’s] testimony would have been"Source
— United States v. Long, 697 F. Supp. 651, 657 (S.D.N.Y. 1988)
(A legal precedent cited to argue that there is no prejudice from an absent witness when their potential testimony is unknown.)
DOJ-OGR-00021025.jpg
Quote #2
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document