DOJ-OGR-00019255.jpg
1.46 MB
Extraction Summary
8
People
6
Organizations
1
Locations
4
Events
3
Relationships
3
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Court docket sheet / memorandum opinion & order
File Size:
1.46 MB
Summary
This document is a page from a court docket in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, listing entries from late July 2020. It includes an affidavit filing, correspondence regarding a protective order, the order itself, and a lengthy Memorandum Opinion & Order by Judge Alison J. Nathan resolving disputes over the protective order's terms regarding public references to victims/witnesses and the use of discovery materials. The court ruled in favor of the Government's proposed language, prioritizing the privacy of alleged victims and witnesses.
People (8)
Organizations (6)
Timeline (4 events)
Filing of Affidavit
Letter Reply to Motion
Issuance of Protective Order
Issuance of Memorandum Opinion & Order
Locations (1)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
Relationships (3)
→
→
→
→
→
→
Key Quotes (3)
"Deciding to participate in or contribute to a criminal investigation or prosecution is a far different matter than simply making a public statement "relating to" Ms. Maxwell or Jeffrey Epstein"Source
DOJ-OGR-00019255.jpg
Quote #1
"The exception the Defense seeks is too broad and risks undermining the protections of the privacy of witnesses and alleged victims that is required by law."Source
DOJ-OGR-00019255.jpg
Quote #2
"The Government labors under many restrictions including Rule 6(e) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure"Source
DOJ-OGR-00019255.jpg
Quote #3
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document