DOJ-OGR-00005819.jpg

638 KB
View Original

Extraction Summary

3
People
3
Organizations
0
Locations
2
Events
1
Relationships
4
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Legal document
File Size: 638 KB
Summary

This legal document is a filing by the Government in case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, arguing for the admissibility of specific evidence and witness testimony at an upcoming trial. The Government contends that exhibits and the testimony of "Employee-1," a former employee of Jeffrey Epstein, constitute direct evidence of the offenses charged and should be admitted, citing an October 11, 2021 letter where this evidence was disclosed to the defense.

People (3)

Name Role Context
Wright & Miller Author
Cited as authors of a legal text, “2020 Amendments to Rule 404(b),” 22B Fed. Prac. & Proc. Evid. § 5242.1 (2d ed.).
Jeffrey Epstein
Mentioned as the employer of a potential witness, "Employee-1".
Employee-1 Witness
An individual who worked for Jeffrey Epstein whom the Government may call as a witness.

Organizations (3)

Name Type Context
Government government agency
Refers to the prosecution in the legal case, arguing for the admissibility of evidence.
Fed. R. Evid. 404(b) Advisory Committee government committee
Quoted via a note regarding the purpose of amendments to Rule 404(b).
Court government agency
The judicial body being addressed in the filing, which is asked to admit evidence.

Timeline (2 events)

2021-10-11
The Government sent a letter to the defense identifying seven exhibits and one witness whose statements it deems admissible for trial.
Government Defense
An upcoming trial where the Government may offer exhibits 401-404, 409-410, and 413, and call "Employee-1" as a witness.

Relationships (1)

Jeffrey Epstein professional Employee-1
The document states that "Employee-1" was an individual "who worked for Jeffrey Epstein".

Key Quotes (4)

"general nature"
Source
— Unknown (from language removed from Evid. 404(b)(3)(B)) (Describing language removed by the 2020 Amendments which previously permitted notice of the 'general nature' of evidence.)
DOJ-OGR-00005819.jpg
Quote #1
"relatively modest"
Source
— Wright & Miller (Describing the 2020 Amendments to Rule 404(b).)
DOJ-OGR-00005819.jpg
Quote #2
"articulate a non-propensity purpose for which the evidence is offered and the basis for concluding that the evidence is relevant in light of this purpose."
Source
— Fed. R. Evid. 404(b) Advisory Committee (Quoted to explain what the 2020 amendments require of a prosecutor.)
DOJ-OGR-00005819.jpg
Quote #3
"described with helpful specificity."
Source
— Fed. R. Evid. 404(b) Advisory Committee (implied) (Stating how other act evidence should be presented.)
DOJ-OGR-00005819.jpg
Quote #4

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document