027.pdf
50.1 KB
Extraction Summary
20
People
11
Organizations
10
Locations
2
Events
5
Relationships
4
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Court filing - motion for leave to file under seal
File Size:
50.1 KB
Summary
This document is a Motion for Leave to File Under Seal submitted on May 29, 2009, by attorneys for Plaintiffs Jane Doe No. 101 and 102 in the Southern District of Florida. The plaintiffs request permission to file their response to Epstein's Motion to Stay under seal, or alternatively, request the court to unseal the Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) so they can adequately respond. The document includes a comprehensive service list detailing attorneys representing Epstein, co-defendant Sarah Kellen (represented by Bruce Reinhart), and various other Jane Doe plaintiffs.
People (20)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Jeffrey Epstein | Defendant |
Defendant in multiple civil cases listed in the document
|
| Jane Doe No. 101 | Plaintiff |
Plaintiff filing motion to seal response or unseal NPA
|
| Jane Doe No. 102 | Plaintiff |
Plaintiff filing motion to seal response or unseal NPA
|
| Sarah Kellen | Co-Defendant |
Represented by Bruce E. Reinhart
|
| Katherine W. Ezell | Attorney |
Attorney for Plaintiffs Jane Doe No. 101 and Jane Doe No. 102 (Podhurst Orseck)
|
| Robert C. Josefsberg | Attorney |
Attorney for Plaintiffs Jane Doe No. 101 and Jane Doe No. 102 (Podhurst Orseck)
|
| Robert Critton | Attorney |
Counsel for Defendant Jeffrey Epstein
|
| Michael J. Pike | Attorney |
Counsel for Defendant Jeffrey Epstein
|
| Jack Goldberger | Attorney |
Co-Counsel for Defendant Jeffrey Epstein
|
| Bruce E. Reinhart | Attorney |
Counsel for Co-Defendant Sarah Kellen
|
| Jack Scarola | Attorney |
Counsel for Plaintiff C.M.A.
|
| Jack P. Hill | Attorney |
Counsel for Plaintiff C.M.A.
|
| Adam Horowitz | Attorney |
Counsel for Plaintiffs in Related Cases
|
| Stuart Mermelstein | Attorney |
Counsel for Plaintiffs in Related Cases
|
| Spencer Todd Kuvin | Attorney |
Counsel for Plaintiff in Related Case No. 08-08804
|
| Theodore Jon Leopold | Attorney |
Counsel for Plaintiff in Related Case No. 08-08804
|
| Richard Willits | Attorney |
Counsel for Plaintiff in Related Case No. 08-80811
|
| Brad Edwards | Attorney |
Counsel for Plaintiff in Related Case No. 08-80893
|
| Isidro Manuel Garcia | Attorney |
Counsel for Plaintiff in Related Case No. 08-80469
|
| C.M.A. | Plaintiff |
Plaintiff in related case 08-CV-80811
|
Organizations (11)
Timeline (2 events)
2008-08-21
Order to Compel Production and Protective Order entered
Southern District of Florida
Court
Jeffrey Epstein
2009-05-29
Filing of Motion for Leave to File Under Seal
United States District Court Southern District of Florida
Locations (10)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
Relationships (5)
Plaintiff vs Defendant in case 09-CV-80591
Plaintiff vs Defendant in case 09-CV-80656
Service list lists Bruce E. Reinhart as 'Counsel for Co-Defendant, Sarah Kellen'
Service list lists Robert Critton as 'Counsel for Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein'
Service list lists Jack Goldberger as 'Co-Counsel for Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein'
Key Quotes (4)
"The Protective Order prohibits Plaintiffs from disclosing the Non-Prosecution Agreement (the 'NPA') or its terms to any third party."Source
027.pdf
Quote #1
"Undersigned counsel seek to file this Response in Opposition to Defendant Jeffrey Epstein’s Motion to Stay under seal in order to abide by this Court’s August 21, 2008 Order"Source
027.pdf
Quote #2
"In the alternative, Plaintiffs respectfully request this Court to unseal the Non-Prosecution Agreement in order to allow Plaintiffs to concretely respond to Defendant’s Motion to Stay."Source
027.pdf
Quote #3
"Plaintiffs Jane Doe No. 101 and Jane Doe No. 102 would then have 'a specific tangible need to be relieved of the restrictions' of the Protective Order because consideration of the terms of the NPA is necessary for this Court to resolve Defendant’s Motion to Stay."Source
027.pdf
Quote #4
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document