Office
OrganizationRelationship Network
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Client |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Qiu Yuanping
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
media
|
Unknown |
1
|
1 | |
|
organization
China News Service
|
Unknown |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
MCC NY
|
Professional organizational |
1
|
1 | |
|
organization
Office of Legislative Affairs
|
Professional organizational |
1
|
1 | |
|
organization
media
|
Control |
1
|
1 | |
|
organization
OLA
|
Internal support |
1
|
1 |
Jeffrey Epstein Part 17 of 17.PDF
This document is a compilation of FBI investigative materials from 2006-2007 regarding the Jeffrey Epstein case (File 31E-MM-108062). It includes evidence envelopes (FD-340s) for biographical files of victims/witnesses, MySpace profile printouts used for tracking subjects, MapQuest driving directions from the FBI West Palm Beach office to various locations, and handwritten interview notes. The notes contain significant details about interactions with Epstein, including him appearing in a robe, giving diet advice, and paying women $200-$300. There are no flight logs present.
064-01.pdf
This document is a Notice of Entry of Order from the Superior Court of the Virgin Islands regarding the Estate of Jeffrey Epstein. The order, signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn P. Hermon-Percell on June 2, 2020, grants the motion to establish the 'Epstein Victims' Compensation Program' and authorizes the Co-Executors to commence the program on or about June 15, 2020. It references a prior hearing on February 4, 2020, and notes that the USVI Attorney General agreed to lift liens to allow funding for the program.
044.pdf
This document is an official letter dated August 10, 2019, from Warden Lamine N'Diaye of the Metropolitan Correctional Center (MCC) to Judges McMahon and Berman. The letter formally notifies the court of Jeffrey Epstein's death at 7:37 a.m. that morning, following an apparent suicide in his cell at 6:30 a.m. It mentions that both the FBI and the Office of the Inspector General are investigating the incident.
014.pdf
This document contains a 2019 SDNY Court Order from Judge Richard Berman docketing two exhibits discussed at a bail hearing. The first exhibit is a transcript of a January 18, 2011, SORA (Sex Offender Registration Act) hearing in New York State Court, where Epstein was classified as a Level 3 sex offender despite arguments from both the Defense and the Prosecution regarding the specifics of his Florida plea deal and the lack of other indictments. The second exhibit is a financial Asset Summary dated June 30, 2019, detailing Epstein's net worth of approximately $559 million, including cash, equities, hedge funds, and properties in New York, New Mexico, Florida, Paris, and the US Virgin Islands.
088.pdf
This document is an official letter from the Florida Department of Corrections dated July 21, 2010, notifying Jeffrey Epstein that his term of supervision has been completed. It outlines the process for the potential restoration of civil rights and firearm ownership rules. A checkbox at the bottom indicates Epstein was on supervision for a sexual offense and includes a reference to an attached 'Notice of Responsibilities'.
2020.03.24%20Initiating%20Document.pdf
A docketing letter from the Superior Court of the Virgin Islands dated March 24, 2020, informing attorney Kyle R. Waldner that Ghislaine Maxwell's debt petition against the Estate of Jeffrey Epstein has been filed. The case is assigned number ST-2020-CV-00155 and presided over by Judge Michael C. Dunston.
2021.03.29%20Response%20-%20Response.pdf
This document is a legal response filed by the Co-Executors of Jeffrey Epstein's estate (Indyke and Kahn) on March 29, 2021, opposing the US Virgin Islands Government's appeal regarding their failed motion to intervene in probate proceedings. The executors argue the Government's petition is untimely as the original motion was denied over a year prior, and that the Government's emergency motion regarding estate assets is moot because the estate has replenished the Victims' Compensation Program funds. Attached exhibits include the original 2020 opposition brief and a March 2021 press release confirming the sale of Epstein's NYC and Palm Beach properties to fund the compensation program.
017-05.pdf
This document is an Omnibus Order from the US District Court for the Southern District of Florida dated February 4, 2010, in the civil case of Jane Doe No. 2 vs. Jeffrey Epstein. The Magistrate Judge rules on the Plaintiff's motions to compel answers to interrogatories, admissions, and production requests. The court upholds Epstein's Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination regarding questions about his financial history, assets, and potential witnesses, but orders him to produce documents that are already known to the government (tax returns, passport, and documents provided to him during plea negotiations), ruling that these fall under the 'foregone conclusion' doctrine.
016-02.pdf
This document is a Motion for No-Contact Order filed by Plaintiffs Jane Doe No. 101 and 102 against Jeffrey Epstein in the Southern District of Florida on May 22, 2009. The plaintiffs argue that despite a state plea agreement prohibiting contact, Epstein's counsel refused to confirm he would not contact federal victims. The filing includes exhibits of correspondence between attorneys and a transcript of the 2008 plea conference where Judge Pucillo explicitly defined 'indirect contact' to include Facebook and MySpace.
050.pdf
This document contains a letter from Troutman Sanders LLP to Judge Debra Freeman in the SDNY, dated June 3, 2020, informing the court that the Superior Court of the Virgin Islands has officially authorized the establishment of the Epstein Victims' Compensation Program. Attached is the official Order from the USVI court (signed by Judge Hermon-Percell) granting the motion to establish the program and authorizing its commencement on June 15, 2020. The document notes that the USVI Attorney General has agreed to lift liens to allow funding for the program.
RESPONSE.pdf
This document is a legal response filed on May 18, 2017, in the Supreme Court of Florida by Jeffrey Epstein's attorney, Paul Morris. In response to a court order dated May 3, 2017, Epstein's counsel concedes that they cannot show cause why the precedent set in 'Debrincat v. Fischer' should not control the case, effectively advising the court that it should decline to exercise jurisdiction over Epstein's petition.
MOTION-EXT%20OF%20TIME%20(JURIS%20BRIEF).pdf
This is a legal motion filed on December 14, 2015, in the Supreme Court of Florida (Case No. SC15-2286) by Jeffrey Epstein's attorney, Paul Morris. Epstein requests an extension of time until January 19, 2016, to file his initial brief on jurisdiction. The document notes that the Respondent's counsel, Philip M. Burlington, has no objection to the request, and includes a service list of attorneys involved in the related proceedings.
LETTER.pdf
This document is a legal filing dated December 10, 2015, in which Jeffrey Epstein's attorney, Paul Morris, files a 'Notice to Invoke Discretionary Jurisdiction' with the Supreme Court of Florida. Epstein is appealing a decision made on November 12, 2015, by the District Court of Appeal (Fourth District) in the case of 'Bradley J. Edwards v. Jeffrey Epstein'. The attached opinion reveals that the lower court reversed a summary judgment that had favored Epstein, ruling that 'litigation privilege' does not bar Edwards' claim of malicious prosecution against Epstein.
ACKNOWLEDGMENT%20LETTER-NEW%20CASE.pdf
This document is an official 'Acknowledgment of New Case' from the Supreme Court of Florida, dated December 11, 2015. It confirms the receipt of a 'Notice to Invoke Discretionary Jurisdiction' filed on December 10, 2015, in the case of Jeffrey Epstein vs. Bradley J. Edwards (Case No. SC15-2286). The document lists relevant case numbers from the lower tribunal and copies various attorneys and clerks involved in the matter.
014-08.pdf
This document is a declaration by FBI Special Agent Timothy R. Slater, executed in 2015, detailing his involvement in the 2006-2007 investigation into Jeffrey Epstein. Slater describes locating and calling a potential victim (whose name is redacted) in early 2007 while accompanied by lead agent Nesbitt E. Kuyrkendall. During the call, the woman confirmed knowing Epstein but refused to cooperate, stating she had moved away to distance herself and wanted to leave the situation in her past.
032.pdf
This document is a legal reply filed on June 4, 2009, by Plaintiffs Jane Doe No. 101 and 102 in the US District Court for the Southern District of Florida. The plaintiffs are requesting a court order prohibiting Jeffrey Epstein and his agents from contacting them directly or indirectly, citing his status as a convicted sex offender and their fear of intimidation. The document also includes a service list detailing the legal representation for various parties, including Bruce E. Reinhart representing co-defendant Sarah Kellen.
027.pdf
This document is a Motion for Leave to File Under Seal submitted on May 29, 2009, by attorneys for Plaintiffs Jane Doe No. 101 and 102 in the Southern District of Florida. The plaintiffs request permission to file their response to Epstein's Motion to Stay under seal, or alternatively, request the court to unseal the Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) so they can adequately respond. The document includes a comprehensive service list detailing attorneys representing Epstein, co-defendant Sarah Kellen (represented by Bruce Reinhart), and various other Jane Doe plaintiffs.
025.pdf
This document is a legal reply filed on May 29, 2009, by Plaintiffs Jane Doe No. 101 and 102 in the Southern District of Florida, arguing for the right to proceed anonymously in their lawsuit against Jeffrey Epstein. The plaintiffs contend that Epstein aims to reveal their identities to harass and intimidate them, and they cite various legal precedents and the Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) to support their request for privacy due to the sexual nature of the crimes committed against them as minors. The document also includes a service list detailing the attorneys representing various parties in related cases against Epstein.
015-01.pdf
This document is a Motion to Stay proceedings filed by Jeffrey Epstein's legal team in a civil case brought by a plaintiff identified as C.M.A. Epstein argues that the civil case should be paused until late 2010, when his Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) with federal prosecutors expires, to avoid forcing him to waive his 5th Amendment rights against self-incrimination while facing potential ongoing criminal liability. The filing includes an affidavit from his criminal defense attorney, Jack Goldberger, and an Indictment from 2006 for Felony Solicitation of Prostitution.
024.pdf
This document is a legal motion filed on May 29, 2009, in the Southern District of Florida by Plaintiffs Jane Doe No. 101 and 102 against Jeffrey Epstein. The plaintiffs request leave to file their response to Epstein's motion to stay under seal because it references the confidential Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA), or alternatively, to unseal the NPA. The document includes a comprehensive service list detailing the legal representation for Epstein (including Robert Critton and Jack Goldberger), Sarah Kellen (represented by Bruce Reinhart), and numerous other Jane Doe plaintiffs.
022.pdf
This document is a legal reply brief filed on May 29, 2009, by Plaintiffs Jane Doe No. 101 and 102 in the Southern District of Florida. The plaintiffs seek to proceed anonymously in their lawsuit against Jeffrey Epstein, arguing that revealing their identities would subject them to harassment, shame, and further trauma, particularly given their status as victims of sexual exploitation as minors. The filing also discusses the Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA), statutory minimum damages under 18 U.S.C. § 2255, and accuses Epstein of using the threat of publicity to intimidate victims into settling.
038.pdf
This document is a Motion to Reschedule Hearing filed on May 29, 2009, in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida. Attorney Robert C. Josefsberg, representing Plaintiffs Jane Doe 101 and 102, requests to move a hearing scheduled for June 12, 2009, because he will be attending his 50th College Reunion in Hanover, New Hampshire. The document includes a comprehensive service list detailing the legal teams associated with Jeffrey Epstein, Sarah Kellen, and various plaintiffs in related cases.
035.pdf
This document is a legal reply filed on May 29, 2009, in the US District Court for the Southern District of Florida by Plaintiffs Jane Doe No. 101 and 102 against Jeffrey Epstein. The plaintiffs argue for the right to proceed anonymously, citing fears of harassment, public humiliation, and Epstein's alleged intent to intimidate victims by exposing their identities. The document lists numerous related cases and provides a service list of attorneys representing various parties, including Bruce Reinhart representing co-defendant Sarah Kellen.
010.pdf
This document is a 'Notice of Striking Docket Entry' filed on May 4, 2009, in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida, case Jane Doe No. 101 v. Jeffrey Epstein. The plaintiff's counsel, Katherine W. Ezell of Podhurst Orseck, P.A., notifies the court that a previous docket entry was filed without a signature and has been re-filed correctly. The document includes a Certificate of Service listing numerous attorneys involved in this case and related cases against Epstein, including Bruce Reinhart (defense), Jack Scarola, and Brad Edwards.
008.pdf
This document is a legal response filed by Plaintiff Jane Doe 101 in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida on May 1, 2009. The plaintiff agrees to the court's order to consolidate ten separate cases filed by various Jane Does and C.M.A. against Jeffrey Epstein for the purposes of discovery. The document includes a service list detailing the contact information for attorneys representing the various plaintiffs and the defendant.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity