DOJ-OGR-00020028.jpg
527 KB
Extraction Summary
6
People
3
Organizations
3
Locations
3
Events
2
Relationships
4
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal document
File Size:
527 KB
Summary
This legal document argues that the court should reconsider Ms. Maxwell's bail application based on new evidence. It cites legal precedents affirming the court's authority to reconsider such decisions and states that Ms. Maxwell has received over 2.7 million pages of discovery from the government since her initial hearing, which allegedly raises serious questions about the strength of the government's case.
People (6)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Nathan, J. | Judge |
Cited for reconsidering a bail decision based on new evidence and COVID-19 concerns.
|
| Lee | Defendant |
Defendant in the cited case United States v. Lee.
|
| Bradshaw | Defendant |
Defendant in the cited case United States v. Bradshaw.
|
| Rowe | Defendant |
Defendant in the cited case United States v. Rowe.
|
| Petrov | Defendant |
Defendant in the cited case United States v. Petrov.
|
| Ms. Maxwell | Defendant |
The subject of the bail application, who has obtained new information and evidence since her initial detention hearing.
|
Organizations (3)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| BOP | Government agency |
Mentioned in relation to concerns about a possible outbreak of COVID-19 in its facilities.
|
| United States | Government |
The plaintiff in several cited legal cases (United States v. Lee, United States v. Bradshaw, United States v. Rowe, U...
|
| Court | Judicial body |
The document discusses the Court's inherent authority to reconsider its own decisions, specifically bail decisions.
|
Timeline (3 events)
Initial detention hearing for Ms. Maxwell.
The government produced voluminous discovery (over 2.7 million pages) to Ms. Maxwell and her counsel.
Ms. Maxwell is presenting a bail application for the Court's consideration.
Locations (3)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
The United States District Court for the District of New Mexico, where the case United States v. Lee was heard.
|
|
|
The United States District Court for the District of Kansas, where the case United States v. Bradshaw was heard.
|
|
|
The United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, where the cases United States v. Rowe and Uni...
|
Relationships (2)
The document states that 'Ms. Maxwell and her counsel have also received and reviewed the voluminous discovery produced by the government'.
The government is the prosecuting party against Ms. Maxwell, providing discovery in her criminal case.
Key Quotes (4)
"could have not have martialed"Source
— Unnamed defendant in United States v. Lee
(Describing evidence that a defendant was unable to present in the short time between indictment and the original hearing.)
DOJ-OGR-00020028.jpg
Quote #1
"[A] release order may be reconsidered even where the evidence proffered on reconsideration was known to the movant at the time of the original hearing."Source
— Court in United States v. Rowe
(A quote establishing the court's authority to reconsider a release order.)
DOJ-OGR-00020028.jpg
Quote #2
"Court’s inherent authority for reconsideration of the Court’s previous bail decision"Source
— Court in United States v. Petrov
(A quote noting the court's power to reconsider its own bail decisions.)
DOJ-OGR-00020028.jpg
Quote #3
"material bearing on the issue whether there are conditions of release"Source
— § 3142(f)
(A legal requirement for new evidence to be considered in a bail hearing.)
DOJ-OGR-00020028.jpg
Quote #4
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document