DOJ-OGR-00005742.jpg

445 KB
View Original

Extraction Summary

8
People
2
Organizations
1
Locations
1
Events
0
Relationships
1
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Legal document
File Size: 445 KB
Summary

This document is a legal argument from a court filing, dated October 29, 2021, in case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. The defense argues that a photographic identification of Ms. Maxwell conducted on June 23, 2021, was suggestive and tainted, and therefore should be suppressed by the Court. The argument cites several U.S. Supreme Court cases to support the claim that the procedure violated the defendant's right to due process.

People (8)

Name Role Context
Ms. Maxwell
Mentioned as the subject of a photographic identification procedure.
Simmons Party in a legal case
Cited in the legal case Simmons v. United States.
Neil Party in a legal case
Cited in the legal case Neil v. Biggers.
Biggers Party in a legal case
Cited in the legal case Neil v. Biggers.
Manson Party in a legal case
Cited in the legal case Manson v. Brathwaite.
Brathwaite Party in a legal case
Cited in the legal case Manson v. Brathwaite.
Stovall Party in a legal case
Cited in the legal case Stovall v. Denno.
Denno Party in a legal case
Cited in the legal case Stovall v. Denno.

Organizations (2)

Name Type Context
Government government agency
Presented photographs for an identification procedure.
Court judicial body
The entity being asked to suppress the identification.

Timeline (1 events)

2021-06-23
The Government presented a series of photographs for identification purposes, which is argued to be the functional equivalent of a one-on-one show-up.

Locations (1)

Location Context
Mentioned in the context of several legal case citations (e.g., Simmons v. United States).

Key Quotes (1)

"a very substantial likelihood of irreparable misidentification."
Source
— Simmons v. United States (A quote from a legal precedent describing the risk created by suggestive police identification procedures.)
DOJ-OGR-00005742.jpg
Quote #1

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document