HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023408.jpg

2.9 MB
View Original

Extraction Summary

5
People
8
Organizations
1
Locations
2
Events
2
Relationships
3
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Legal document (westlaw printout/court filing excerpt)
File Size: 2.9 MB
Summary

This document is a page from a legal brief or court opinion (sourced from Westlaw) regarding litigation surrounding the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks. It argues for the reversal of dismissals for the Saudi Joint Relief Committee, Saudi Red Crescent Society, and National Commercial Bank based on the precedent set in 'Doe v. Bin Laden' regarding the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act (FSIA). The document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' Bates stamp, indicating it was part of a document production to the House Oversight Committee, though the text itself does not mention Jeffrey Epstein.

People (5)

Name Role Context
Bin Laden Defendant (referenced)
Referenced in case citation 'Doe v. Bin Laden'
Doe Plaintiff (referenced)
Referenced in case citation 'Doe v. Bin Laden' and 'Doe' precedent
Carter Party in case citation
Referenced in citation 'Carter v. Barry'
Barry Party in case citation
Referenced in citation 'Carter v. Barry'
Ahern Party in case citation
Referenced in citation 'Ahern v. Cnty. of Nassau'

Organizations (8)

Name Type Context
Saudi Joint Relief Committee
One of the 'Sovereign Defendants' whose dismissal is being contested
Saudi Red Crescent Society
One of the 'Sovereign Defendants' whose dismissal is being contested
National Commercial Bank (NCB)
Bank whose dismissal is being contested
Frontera Res. Azer. Corp.
Referenced in legal precedent
State Oil Co. of the Azer. Rep.
Referenced in legal precedent
Thomson Reuters
Westlaw copyright holder
House Oversight Committee
Implied by Bates stamp 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT'
Second Circuit Court of Appeals
Implied by '2d Cir.' citations and context of appeal

Timeline (2 events)

2012
Legal filing/opinion context
Court
September 11, 2001
Terrorist Attacks
USA

Locations (1)

Location Context
Referenced in citation 'Ahern v. Cnty. of Nassau'

Relationships (2)

collectively, 'Sovereign Defendants'
Plaintiffs Legal Adversaries National Commercial Bank
Plaintiffs previously raised this argument... to Summarily Vacate and Remand these three defendants.

Key Quotes (3)

"The Court should reverse the dismissals of three defendants -- the Saudi Joint Relief Committee and Saudi Red Crescent Society... and National Commercial Bank... and remand for jurisdictional discovery"
Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023408.jpg
Quote #1
"the terrorism exception, rather than limiting the jurisdiction conferred by the noncommercial tort exception, provides an additional basis for jurisdiction."
Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023408.jpg
Quote #2
"the noncommercial tort exception can be a basis for a suit arising from the terrorist acts of September 11, 2001."
Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023408.jpg
Quote #3

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document