Bin Laden
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Doe
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2005-02-07 | Legal case | Ruling in United States v. Bin Laden, where a court held that a single sentence in a New York Tim... | S.D.N.Y. | View |
| 2005-02-07 | N/A | Decision in United States v. Bin Laden | S.D.N.Y. | View |
DOJ-OGR-00021535.jpg
This legal document argues that a news article alleging juror misconduct is insufficient to warrant an evidentiary hearing. It cites numerous legal precedents from various courts, including the Second Circuit, which have consistently held that unsworn, hearsay, anonymous, or speculative reports do not meet the high evidentiary standard required to investigate such claims.
DOJ-OGR-00009160.jpg
This document is page 41 of a legal brief filed on February 24, 2022, in the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). The text argues against granting an evidentiary hearing regarding juror misconduct allegations, citing precedents from cases involving El Chapo (Guzman Loera), Bin Laden, and Martha Stewart. The argument asserts that unsworn newspaper reports or anonymous claims are insufficient evidence to warrant a juror inquiry.
DOJ-OGR-00009839.jpg
This document is page 41 of a legal filing (Document 643, filed March 11, 2022) in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). The text presents legal arguments citing precedents (Guzman Loera, Bin Laden, Martha Stewart) to oppose an evidentiary hearing regarding juror misconduct allegations based solely on unsworn media reports. The filing argues that newspaper articles and hearsay do not constitute 'incontrovertible evidence' required to justify post-trial juror inquiries.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023408.jpg
This document is a page from a legal brief or court opinion (sourced from Westlaw) regarding litigation surrounding the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks. It argues for the reversal of dismissals for the Saudi Joint Relief Committee, Saudi Red Crescent Society, and National Commercial Bank based on the precedent set in 'Doe v. Bin Laden' regarding the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act (FSIA). The document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' Bates stamp, indicating it was part of a document production to the House Oversight Committee, though the text itself does not mention Jeffrey Epstein.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023407.jpg
This document is a page from a legal brief or opinion related to the litigation surrounding the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks (In re: Terrorist Attacks). It argues against a district court's dismissal of claims, contending that defendants who provided material support to al-Qaeda through intermediaries or 'front charities' should be held liable under the Anti-Terrorism Act (ATA). It specifically critiques the reasoning of Judge Daniels, comparing it to his predecessor Judge Casey, and cites various legal precedents regarding indirect support of terrorism.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023367.jpg
This document is page 7 of a Table of Authorities from a legal brief generated via Westlaw in 2019, likely related to the 9/11 terrorist attacks litigation ('In re: TERRORIST ATTACKS ON SEPTEMBER 11, 2001'). It carries a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' Bates stamp, indicating it was part of a document production to the House Oversight Committee. While the user identifies this as Epstein-related, there are no direct mentions of Jeffrey Epstein or his immediate associates on this specific page; however, the inclusion of cases involving Deutsche Bank (implied by similar financial litigations) or UBS AG suggests this may be part of a larger file regarding financial institutions.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015026.jpg
This document appears to be a compilation of notes and communications produced by the House Oversight Committee (stamped HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015026). It draws parallels between Bin Laden and Erik Prince, discusses conspiracy theories regarding '9/11' dates and the New World Order, and criticizes US detainee policy. The document culminates in a disturbing 2014 email to a 'Deputy Lyddy' reporting that an unidentified female is 'physically exhausted, VERY sleep deprived, and HUNGRY.'
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015025.jpg
This document outlines Kenneth Starr's legal defense of Blackwater regarding the 2004 Fallujah Ambush and his role in securing a non-prosecution agreement for Jeffrey Epstein. It draws parallels between intelligence assets like Erik Prince and Bin Laden, suggesting government complicity in using such figures for operations outside standard political restrictions.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029648.tif
This document excerpt discusses concerns about the security of Pakistan's nuclear arsenal, citing a 2009 WikiLeaked cable where French security adviser Jean-David Levitte expressed doubts. It also touches on the Indo-Pakistani conflict, the failure of Siachen Glacier talks, and critically evaluates General Kayani's pre-Abbottabad raid claims about defeating militants. The text concludes by identifying Bruce Riedel as a relevant expert and author.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029647.tif
This document details the career and alleged complicity of General Nadeem Taj, a former DG/ISI, in various militant activities. It describes his role in orchestrating a coup for Pervez Musharraf, his command of the Kakul Military Academy near bin Laden's hideout, and accusations of ISI involvement in the 2008 Indian embassy bombing in Kabul, undermining drone programs, and planning the Mumbai attack.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity