DOJ-OGR-00021194.jpg
800 KB
Extraction Summary
2
People
3
Organizations
0
Locations
3
Events
1
Relationships
3
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal document
File Size:
800 KB
Summary
This document is a table of contents from a legal report, likely by the Office of Professional Responsibility (OPR), concerning the federal investigation of Epstein. The report's findings, as outlined here, conclude that U.S. Attorney Acosta and other subjects did not violate any professional standards or policies when they entered into a Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) with Epstein. The document also indicates the report found no evidence that the subjects were improperly influenced by corruption or by Epstein's status and wealth.
People (2)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Acosta | U.S. Attorney (implied) |
Mentioned multiple times regarding his decision to decline federal prosecution of Epstein, his use of a Non-Prosecuti...
|
| Epstein | Subject of investigation |
The individual at the center of the federal investigation and the recipient of the Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) di...
|
Organizations (3)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| OPR | government agency |
Stands for Office of Professional Responsibility (implied). It is the entity that conducted the investigation and fou...
|
| USAO | government agency |
Stands for U.S. Attorney's Office. Mentioned in relation to its agreement not to prosecute unidentified 'Potential Co...
|
| Department | government agency |
Refers to the Department of Justice (implied). Mentioned in the context of its regulations and policies which were al...
|
Timeline (3 events)
Key Quotes (3)
"OPR FOUND THAT NONE OF THE SUBJECTS VIOLATED A CLEAR AND UNAMBIGUOUS STATUTE, PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY RULE OR STANDARD, OR DEPARTMENT REGULATION OR POLICY, IN NEGOTIATING, APPROVING, OR ENTERING INTO THE NPA"Source
— OPR (Office of Professional Responsibility)
(This is the main finding of Section III of the report, serving as a heading.)
DOJ-OGR-00021194.jpg
Quote #1
"THE EVIDENCE DOES NOT ESTABLISH THAT THE SUBJECTS WERE INFLUENCED BY IMPROPER MOTIVES TO INCLUDE IN THE NPA TERMS FAVORABLE TO EPSTEIN OR TO OTHERWISE EXTEND BENEFITS TO EPSTEIN"Source
— OPR (Office of Professional Responsibility)
(This is the main finding of Section IV of the report, serving as a heading.)
DOJ-OGR-00021194.jpg
Quote #2
"Acosta’s Decision to Decline to Prosecute Epstein Federally Does Not Constitute Professional Misconduct"Source
— OPR (Office of Professional Responsibility)
(A sub-heading and specific finding within the report's table of contents.)
DOJ-OGR-00021194.jpg
Quote #3
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document