DOJ-OGR-00009827.jpg

724 KB
View Original

Extraction Summary

3
People
1
Organizations
1
Locations
2
Events
1
Relationships
2
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Legal document
File Size: 724 KB
Summary

This legal document, a page from a court filing, discusses the issue of juror bias in sexual abuse cases. The author argues against a mandatory presumption of bias for jurors who are survivors of sexual abuse, citing legal precedents like State v. Ashfar and Torres. The document asserts that the court correctly conducted targeted inquiries into jurors' ability to be impartial, rather than automatically striking them, noting that a contrary rule would disqualify a large portion of the jury pool.

People (3)

Name Role Context
Ashfar Party in a legal case
Mentioned in the case citation 'State v. Ashfar, 196 A.3d 93, 94 (N.H. 2018)'.
Juror 6 Juror
Mentioned as a juror who acknowledged he could not sit on a previous sexual assault case due to feelings about his da...
Torres Party in a legal case
Mentioned in the case citation 'Torres, 128 F.3d at 45'.

Organizations (1)

Name Type Context
Court government agency
Referenced throughout the document as the judicial body handling the case and making decisions on juror bias.

Timeline (2 events)

A post-verdict hearing was held where a trial court found a juror demonstrated bias.
trial court juror
Juror 6 was called for jury service in a sexual assault case involving a minor victim.

Locations (1)

Location Context
Mentioned in the context of a state court decision ('New Hampshire state decision') and a case citation ('N.H. 2018').

Relationships (1)

Juror 6 personal Juror 6's daughter
The document states that Juror 6 could not sit on a previous jury "due to his feelings about his daughter".

Key Quotes (2)

"when called for jury service in another sexual assault case involving an alleged victim who was a minor, Juror 6 acknowledged that he could not sit on that jury due to his feelings about his daughter; and . . . there appears to be little in the way of logical explanation for how he could have differentiated between the two cases."
Source
— State v. Ashfar, 196 A.3d 93, 98 (N.H. 2018) (Quoted from a New Hampshire state court decision to illustrate a point about juror bias.)
DOJ-OGR-00009827.jpg
Quote #1
"average man"
Source
— Torres, 128 F.3d at 45 (Mentioned as the basis for an implied bias finding in the Torres case.)
DOJ-OGR-00009827.jpg
Quote #2

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document