| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Juror 6's daughter
|
Familial |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Juror 6's daughter
|
Friend |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Legal proceeding | A post-verdict hearing was held in the Ashfar case to assess a juror's bias. | New Hampshire | View |
| N/A | Jury service | Juror 6 was called for jury service in a sexual assault case involving a minor victim and stated ... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Jury service | Juror 6 was called for jury service in a sexual assault case involving a minor victim. | N/A | View |
This page from a legal document, filed on February 24, 2022, discusses the legal standard for juror bias in sexual abuse cases. The author argues against a mandatory presumption of bias for jurors who have experienced sexual abuse, distinguishing the current case from a New Hampshire state decision (State v. Ashfar). The document asserts that the court correctly conducted targeted follow-up inquiries to determine impartiality rather than automatically striking such jurors, which is consistent with the law in the circuit.
This legal document, a page from a court filing, discusses the issue of juror bias in sexual abuse cases. The author argues against a mandatory presumption of bias for jurors who are survivors of sexual abuse, citing legal precedents like State v. Ashfar and Torres. The document asserts that the court correctly conducted targeted inquiries into jurors' ability to be impartial, rather than automatically striking them, noting that a contrary rule would disqualify a large portion of the jury pool.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity