DOJ-OGR-00008391.jpg

715 KB
View Original

Extraction Summary

4
People
4
Organizations
1
Locations
2
Events
1
Relationships
5
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Legal document
File Size: 715 KB
Summary

This legal document is a page from a court filing, specifically page 5 of 6 from Document 548 in case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, filed on December 15, 2021. The Court denies the Defense's request for a witness to testify under a pseudonym, arguing that the witness does not qualify as a victim under the Crime Victims' Rights Act because her anticipated testimony is that she was not a target of sexual misconduct by Epstein or Ms. Maxwell. The Court distinguishes this situation from a prior ruling where pseudonyms were allowed to protect the identities of other, actual victims.

People (4)

Name Role Context
Epstein
Mentioned as the alleged perpetrator of sexual abuse and misconduct.
Ms. Maxwell
Mentioned as an alleged perpetrator of sexual misconduct and an offense.
Ray
Mentioned in the case citation 'United States v. Ray'.
Ippolito
Mentioned in the case citation 'In re Ippolito'.

Organizations (4)

Name Type Context
Government government agency
Mentioned in the context of the 'Government's theory of the case'.
Court judicial body
Mentioned throughout the document as the decision-making body in the legal case.
Defense legal team
Mentioned throughout as a party in the case, arguing for a witness to use a pseudonym.
DOJ government agency
Appears in the footer identifier 'DOJ-OGR-00008391'.

Timeline (2 events)

2021-12-15
Document 548 was filed in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE.
The Court is analyzing and ruling on the Defense's motion for a witness to testify under a pseudonym.

Locations (1)

Location Context
Mentioned in a case citation '(S.D.N.Y. 2020)', referring to the Southern District of New York.

Relationships (1)

Epstein co-defendant/associate Ms. Maxwell
They are mentioned together as alleged perpetrators of sexual misconduct.

Key Quotes (5)

"a person directly and proximately harmed as a result of the commission of a Federal offense."
Source
— Crime Victims’ Rights Act (The legal definition of a victim as cited from 18 U.S.C. § 3771(e)(2)(A).)
DOJ-OGR-00008391.jpg
Quote #1
"expansive"
Source
— Court/Legal Document (Describing the Crime Victims' Rights Act's definition of a victim.)
DOJ-OGR-00008391.jpg
Quote #2
"whether physically, financially, psychologically, or otherwise"
Source
— Court/Legal Document (Describing the ways in which a witness could have been harmed to qualify as a victim.)
DOJ-OGR-00008391.jpg
Quote #3
"[O]ne does not acquire status under the CVRA based on his own say-so."
Source
— In re Ippolito, 811 F. App’x 795, 797 (3d Cir. 2020) (A quote from a legal precedent used to support the Court's argument.)
DOJ-OGR-00008391.jpg
Quote #4
"because the disclosure of their identities would necessarily reveal the identities of the alleged victims."
Source
— Court (The Court's explanation for previously allowing two non-victims to testify under pseudonyms.)
DOJ-OGR-00008391.jpg
Quote #5

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document