HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_010566.jpg
1.29 MB
Extraction Summary
3
People
1
Organizations
1
Locations
1
Events
2
Relationships
3
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal filing (court document - statement of undisputed facts)
File Size:
1.29 MB
Summary
This is a 'Statement of Undisputed Facts' filed by Defendant Bradley J. Edwards in a civil case brought by Plaintiff Jeffrey Epstein in Palm Beach County, Florida (Case No. 50 2009 CA 040800XXXXMBAG). The document asserts that Epstein has a sexual preference for young children, citing a deposition from March 17, 2010, where Epstein invoked the Fifth Amendment. A footnote argues that Edwards is entitled to an adverse inference regarding Epstein's silence.
People (3)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Jeffrey Epstein | Plaintiff |
Plaintiff in the civil suit; subject of the 'Statement of Undisputed Facts' regarding sexual preference for children.
|
| Scott Rothstein | Defendant |
Sued individually by Epstein.
|
| Bradley J. Edwards | Defendant / Attorney |
Sued individually; filing the Statement of Undisputed Facts.
|
Organizations (1)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Circuit Court of the 15th Judicial Circuit |
Court where the case is filed (Palm Beach County, Florida).
|
Timeline (1 events)
Locations (1)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Jurisdiction of the court.
|
Relationships (2)
Epstein is Plaintiff vs. Edwards as Defendant in Case No. 50 2009 CA 040800XXXXMBAG
Epstein is Plaintiff vs. Rothstein as Defendant
Key Quotes (3)
"Defendant Epstein has a sexual preference for young children."Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_010566.jpg
Quote #1
"When questioned about this subject at his deposition, Epstein invoked his Fifth Amendment right to remain silent rather than make an incriminating admission."Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_010566.jpg
Quote #2
"Edwards is entitled to the adverse inference against Epstein that, had Epstein answered, the answer would have been unfavorable to him."Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_010566.jpg
Quote #3
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document