DOJ-OGR-00009238.jpg

1.1 MB
View Original

Extraction Summary

10
People
4
Organizations
2
Locations
3
Events
3
Relationships
3
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Legal document
File Size: 1.1 MB
Summary

This document is a court transcript from February 15, 2012, in the case of U.S. v. Daugertas. The transcript details a legal argument regarding a request to close the courtroom for the testimony of a witness, Catherine Conrad, due to sensitive information about her alcohol dependency and disciplinary proceedings. The court denies the request, citing prior disclosures of the information and the defendants' right to a public proceeding. The transcript also reveals that Ms. Conrad intends to invoke her Fifth Amendment right, and counsel has submitted an application to compel her testimony with immunity.

People (10)

Name Role Context
PAUL M. DAUGERDAS Defendant
Named in the case title: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. PAUL M. DAUGERDAS, ET AL.
Juror No. 1 Juror
An application was made on behalf of Juror No. 1 concerning closure of the courtroom.
Ms. Sternheim Counsel
Attorney arguing on behalf of Ms. Conrad for the closure of the courtroom and discussing Ms. Conrad's Fifth Amendment...
Ms. Conrad Witness
The subject of the hearing, whose alcohol dependence, medical conditions, and disciplinary proceedings are being disc...
Catherine Conrad Witness
Full name for Ms. Conrad, mentioned as the author of a letter dated February 8, 2012, requesting a closed courtroom.
Mr. Gair Counsel
Counsel who declines to be heard on sealing the courtroom and is expected to call Ms. Conrad as a witness.
Mr. Okula Counsel
Counsel who declines to be heard on sealing the courtroom and later explains the procedure for calling Ms. Conrad and...
Mr. Rotert Counsel
Counsel who declines to be heard further on the question of sealing the courtroom.
Presley
Cited in a legal precedent regarding the closure of a courtroom (Presley v. Georgia).
Walker
Cited in a legal precedent regarding the closure of a courtroom (Walker v. Georgia).

Organizations (4)

Name Type Context
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA government agency
Plaintiff in the case.
First Department government agency
Location of non-public disciplinary proceedings involving Ms. Conrad.
First Judicial Department government agency
Location of the departmental disciplinary committee that held proceedings concerning Ms. Conrad's medical suspension.
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS company
Listed at the bottom of page 100, likely the court reporting service.

Timeline (3 events)

2012-02-15
A court hearing to discuss an application to close the courtroom for the testimony of Ms. Conrad, her intention to invoke the Fifth Amendment, and a request to grant her immunity.
courtroom
2012-02-15
Planned testimony of Ms. Conrad where she intends to assert her Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination.
courtroom
A pending disciplinary proceeding concerning Ms. Conrad's medical suspension held before the disciplinary committee of the First Judicial Department.
First Judicial Department

Locations (2)

Location Context
The location of the hearing, with a discussion about whether to close it to the public for testimony.
Mentioned in the case citations Presley v. Georgia and Walker v. Georgia.

Relationships (3)

Ms. Sternheim professional Ms. Conrad
Ms. Sternheim is acting as counsel for Ms. Conrad, arguing on her behalf for a closed courtroom and informing the court of her client's intention to invoke the Fifth Amendment.
Mr. Gair professional Ms. Conrad
Mr. Gair is the counsel who is calling Ms. Conrad as a witness in the hearing.
Mr. Okula professional Mr. Gair
Mr. Okula states, "I have spoken with Mr. Gair, and we understand that the procedure is that Mr. Gair is going to call Ms. Conrad," indicating they are coordinating as counsel.

Key Quotes (3)

"However, I maintain that she does have the right to confidentiality regarding her condition and any treatment she may have received."
Source
— MS. STERNHEIM (Arguing for the closure of the courtroom to protect Ms. Conrad's privacy.)
DOJ-OGR-00009238.jpg
Quote #1
"The information Ms. Conrad seeks to shield from public view has already been disseminated... Accordingly, her application is denied."
Source
— THE COURT (The judge's ruling against closing the courtroom, stating there is no overriding interest to protect.)
DOJ-OGR-00009238.jpg
Quote #2
"Your Honor has before you an application that we have submitted requesting that she be compelled to testify and be given use immunity in connection with that testimony."
Source
— MR. OKULA (Informing the court of a motion to compel Ms. Conrad's testimony after she invokes her Fifth Amendment rights.)
DOJ-OGR-00009238.jpg
Quote #3

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document