DOJ-OGR-00008409.jpg

645 KB
View Original

Extraction Summary

2
People
5
Organizations
1
Locations
3
Events
2
Relationships
0
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Legal document
File Size: 645 KB
Summary

This legal document, filed on December 17, 2021, is a page from a court proceeding in the case against Ms. Maxwell. The judge is providing guidance on the admissibility of evidence, citing the 2013 case 'United States v. Borrero' as precedent. The court will permit the defense to cross-examine government witnesses about their prior statements that did not implicate Ms. Maxwell in order to impeach their credibility.

People (2)

Name Role Context
Ms. Maxwell Defendant
Mentioned as the defendant whose guilt is being considered by the jury. The defense seeks to admit prior witness stat...
Borrero Defendant in a cited case
Mentioned in the legal case 'United States v. Borrero', which is cited as an analogous case.

Organizations (5)

Name Type Context
government Government agency
Refers to the prosecution in the case against Ms. Maxwell.
law enforcement Government agency
Mentioned as the recipient of a witness's prior statement in the 'United States v. Borrero' case.
Court Judicial body
Refers to the court presiding over the case, which is providing guidance on permissible cross-examination.
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. Company
Listed at the bottom of the page, likely the court reporting service that transcribed the proceedings.
DOJ-OGR Government agency
Appears as part of a document identifier (DOJ-OGR-00008409), likely indicating the Department of Justice.

Timeline (3 events)

2013
The legal case of United States v. Borrero, 2013 WL 6020773 (S.D.N.Y. 2013), was decided. It is cited as a precedent regarding cross-examination of a witness about prior statements.
S.D.N.Y.
Borrero United States
2021-12-17
This document (549-1) was filed in the case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE.
The court provides guidance on the admissibility of evidence, specifically allowing the defense to cross-examine government witnesses on prior statements that did not implicate Ms. Maxwell.

Locations (1)

Location Context
The Southern District of New York, mentioned in the citation for the Borrero case (S.D.N.Y. 2013).

Relationships (2)

Ms. Maxwell Adversarial (legal) government
The document describes the legal proceedings where the 'government' is prosecuting 'Ms. Maxwell'.
Defense Adversarial (legal) government's witnesses
The document states that the 'Defense seeks to impeach the credibility of some witnesses' from the government's side.

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document