HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017738.jpg
2.56 MB
Extraction Summary
10
People
4
Organizations
2
Locations
2
Events
2
Relationships
2
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal/academic law review page
File Size:
2.56 MB
Summary
This document analyzes the legal issues surrounding the subpoena of victim records without notice, using the Elizabeth Smart kidnapping case as a key example. It argues that current rules fail to protect victims' privacy rights under the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA) and the Constitution, highlighting the risks when third-party custodians release sensitive information.
People (10)
Organizations (4)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Salt Lake Trib. | ||
| Deseret Morning News | ||
| Supreme Court | ||
| Lewis & Clark L. Rev. |
Timeline (2 events)
Kidnapping of Elizabeth Smart
Subpoena of Elizabeth Smart's school records
Locations (2)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
Relationships (2)
→
→
to
→
→
Key Quotes (2)
"Serving such subpoenas without notice to the victim violates the provisions of the CVRA guaranteeing victims the rights to be treated "with respect for the victim's dignity and privacy" and "with fairness.""Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017738.jpg
Quote #1
"It is well settled that a right to privacy is implicitly incorporated within the protections guaranteed under the [*877] United States Constitution."Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017738.jpg
Quote #2
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document