DOJ-OGR-00001799.jpg
970 KB
Extraction Summary
6
People
3
Organizations
2
Locations
1
Events
3
Relationships
3
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal document
File Size:
970 KB
Summary
This legal document is a letter dated October 14, 2020, from attorney Christian R. Everdell to Judge Alison J. Nathan. Everdell argues against the government's request to delay the disclosure of evidence to his client, Ms. Maxwell, in case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN. He asserts the government has not provided sufficient legal justification, such as risks to an ongoing investigation or witness safety, and asks the court to order the immediate production of the materials to the defense.
People (6)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Alison J. Nathan | The Honorable |
Recipient of the letter, presumably the judge presiding over the case.
|
| Ms. Maxwell | Defendant |
The defendant in the case, against whom the government is seeking to delay disclosure of materials.
|
| Christian R. Everdell |
The author of the letter, representing the defense.
|
|
| Smith |
Mentioned in the legal case citation 'See Smith, 985 F. Supp. 2d at 531-32'.
|
|
| Mennino |
Mentioned in the legal case citation 'United States v. Mennino, 480 F. Supp. 1182, 1188 (S.D.N.Y. 1979)'.
|
|
| Urena |
Mentioned in the legal case citation 'United States v. Urena, 989 F. Supp. 2d 253, 262-63 (S.D.N.Y. 2013)'.
|
Organizations (3)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| COHEN & GRESSER LLP | company |
The law firm of Christian R. Everdell, the author of the letter.
|
| government | government agency |
Refers to the prosecution in the legal case, which is requesting to delay disclosure of materials.
|
| Court | government agency |
Referenced as the body that should deny the government's request.
|
Timeline (1 events)
2020-10-14
A letter was filed with the court arguing against the government's request to delay disclosure of evidence to the defense.
S.D.N.Y. (implied)
Locations (2)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
The address of the law firm COHEN & GRESSER LLP.
|
|
|
Southern District of New York, mentioned in legal case citations.
|
Relationships (3)
Christian R. Everdell is writing on behalf of Ms. Maxwell, arguing against the government's motion, indicating a lawyer-client relationship.
The government is prosecuting Ms. Maxwell, who is the defendant in the case.
Everdell, as an attorney, is addressing Judge Nathan, who is presiding over the case.
Key Quotes (3)
"jeopardize the government’s ongoing investigation"Source
— government (as quoted by the author)
(The government's asserted reason for requesting a delay in disclosing materials.)
DOJ-OGR-00001799.jpg
Quote #1
"alert the targets of the investigation and could lead to efforts by them to frustrate the ongoing investigations"Source
— Case law (Smith, 985 F. Supp. 2d at 531-32)
(A quote from a cited case illustrating a valid reason for courts to allow delayed disclosure.)
DOJ-OGR-00001799.jpg
Quote #2
"clearly defined, specific and serious injury"Source
— Rule 16(d)(1) (legal standard)
(The legal standard that the author argues the government has failed to meet to justify delaying disclosure.)
DOJ-OGR-00001799.jpg
Quote #3
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document