DOJ-OGR-00001736.jpg
740 KB
Extraction Summary
7
People
3
Organizations
1
Locations
1
Events
2
Relationships
5
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal filing (government letter response)
File Size:
740 KB
Summary
This is the final page (page 5) of a legal filing by the US Attorney's Office in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330). The Government argues that the defendant's request to use criminal discovery materials in separate civil cases should be denied because the materials are irrelevant to the civil litigation and the request attempts to bypass a protective order. The Government asserts the defendant is attempting to use these materials merely to attack the Government in a forum where it cannot respond.
People (7)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Alison J. Nathan | Judge |
Addressee of the letter (Honorable)
|
| Ghislaine Maxwell | Defendant |
Referred to as 'the defendant' (identified via Case 1:20-cr-00330)
|
| Audrey Strauss | Acting United States Attorney |
Signatory of the document
|
| Maurene Comey | Assistant United States Attorney |
Signatory/Author
|
| Alison Moe | Assistant United States Attorney |
Signatory/Author
|
| Lara Pomerantz | Assistant United States Attorney |
Signatory/Author
|
| The Recipient | Unknown Entity |
Subject of alleged false accusations by the defendant regarding subpeonas
|
Organizations (3)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| United States Attorney's Office |
Southern District of New York
|
|
| The Government |
Prosecution/Plaintiff
|
|
| District Court |
Southern District of New York
|
Timeline (1 events)
2020-08-21
Filing of Government response letter
Southern District of New York
Government Attorneys
Judge Nathan
Locations (1)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Jurisdiction of the court and attorneys
|
Relationships (2)
Prosecution (US Attorney) opposing the defendant's application.
Listed together as Assistant United States Attorneys.
Key Quotes (5)
"the Defense Letter completely fails to explain what legal argument she wishes to make in her Civil Cases based on the discovery materials"Source
DOJ-OGR-00001736.jpg
Quote #1
"The fact that the Government issued grand jury subpoenas and obtained court authorization for compliance with one of those subpoenas has no conceivable relevance to disputed issues in the Civil Cases."Source
DOJ-OGR-00001736.jpg
Quote #2
"the defendant identifies no specific reason why these materials are relevant... other than to falsely accuse the Recipient and the Government of some sort of malfeasance."Source
DOJ-OGR-00001736.jpg
Quote #3
"offer no explanation of the relevant legal theory... not to mention a compelling reason for this Court to permit an end-run around the protective order"Source
DOJ-OGR-00001736.jpg
Quote #4
"the defendant intends to use criminal discovery materials to attack the Government in the Civil Cases"Source
DOJ-OGR-00001736.jpg
Quote #5
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document