DOJ-OGR-00005575.jpg
678 KB
Extraction Summary
6
People
4
Organizations
1
Locations
2
Events
1
Relationships
4
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal document
File Size:
678 KB
Summary
This legal document is a page from a government filing arguing in favor of a limited sealing request to protect the identities of minor victims. The government asserts that this request is minimally burdensome and legally sound, citing precedents where victim privacy outweighs public access, especially for evidence not yet shared in open court. It directly refutes the defense's claim that the request violates Second Circuit law by distinguishing the cases the defense relies upon.
People (6)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Amodeo | Party in a court case |
Mentioned in the case citation 'United States v. Amodeo, 71 F.3d 1044, 1050 (2d Cir. 1995)'.
|
| Cohen | Party in a court case |
Mentioned in the case citation 'United States v. Cohen, 366 F. Supp. 3d 612, 626-627 (S.D.N.Y. 2019)'.
|
| Minor Victims | Victim |
Referenced as individuals whose interests are protected by a limited sealing request, who were sexually abused as min...
|
| Paris | Party in a court case |
Mentioned in the case citation 'See Paris, 2007 WL 1484974, at *2'.
|
| Jane Does | Victim |
Mentioned as individuals whose testimony the public and press will be able to hear in full.
|
| Graham | Party in a court case |
Mentioned in the case citation 'United States v. Graham, 257 F.3d 143, 149 (2d Cir. 2001)'.
|
Organizations (4)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| United States | government agency |
Cited as a party in the court cases 'United States v. Amodeo', 'United States v. Cohen', and 'United States v. Graham'.
|
| Government | government agency |
Referenced as the entity making a motion (Gov't Mot.) and a sealing request. Also mentioned in a footnote regarding a...
|
| Second Circuit | judicial body |
Referenced in the context of 'Second Circuit Law' and as the circuit court for several cited cases (2d Cir.).
|
| National Broadcasting Co. | company |
Cited in the case 'Application of National Broadcasting Co., 635 F.2d 945, 951-52 (2d Cir. 1980)'.
|
Timeline (2 events)
A limited sealing request was made to protect the interests of Minor Victims.
Government
defense
The document discusses the public dissemination of records shared at trial and the Government's willingness to address arguments about exhibits on a document-by-document basis at trial.
Government
defense
Locations (1)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Mentioned as the court district for the 'United States v. Cohen' case (Southern District of New York).
|
Relationships (1)
The document contrasts the Government's legal arguments for a sealing request with the defense's opposition to it, citing different legal precedents to support their respective positions.
Key Quotes (4)
"catering” to “sensational” interests."Source
— United States v. Amodeo
(Quoted in the Government's Motion to describe what is avoided by keeping matters private rather than public.)
DOJ-OGR-00005575.jpg
Quote #1
"the public and press will be able to hear the Jane Does’ and Minors’ testimony in full"Source
— Paris, 2007 WL 1484974
(Cited as a reason why the interest in protecting victim identities outweighs the public interest in access to information.)
DOJ-OGR-00005575.jpg
Quote #2
"contrary to well-established Second Circuit Law"Source
— defense
(The defense's argument against the government's sealing request, as stated in their opposition filing (Def. Opp. at 23).)
DOJ-OGR-00005575.jpg
Quote #3
"because with respect to that item of evidence, the session of court was not public."Source
— Application of National Broadcasting Co.
(Quoted in the Graham case to explain why the presumption of public access does not apply to evidence submitted under seal.)
DOJ-OGR-00005575.jpg
Quote #4
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document