DOJ-OGR-00000642.jpg

604 KB
View Original

Extraction Summary

5
People
2
Organizations
0
Locations
2
Events
0
Relationships
1
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Legal document
File Size: 604 KB
Summary

This document is a page from a court transcript where an unidentified speaker critiques an article from the New York Law Journal. The speaker refutes the opinions of two professors who argued against holding a public hearing and allowing victims to speak in the Jeffrey Epstein case, calling their suggestions 'incredulous' and incorrect as a matter of law.

People (5)

Name Role Context
two professors professor
Mentioned as authors of an article or commentary in the New York Law Journal regarding legal procedure and transparency.
a prosecutor prosecutor
Mentioned in a hypothetical scenario described by the two professors, where a prosecutor seeks to dismiss an indictment.
the judge judge
Mentioned in the context of the professors' opinion that a judge would not schedule a hearing or allow victims to speak.
the victims victim
Mentioned in the context of whether they would be allowed to speak at a hearing.
Jeffrey Epstein
Mentioned as the subject of the case being discussed ("In the Jeffrey Epstein case").

Organizations (2)

Name Type Context
New York Law Journal publication
The source of an article or commentary from two professors that the speaker is discussing.
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. company
Listed at the bottom of the page, likely the court reporting service that transcribed the proceedings.

Timeline (2 events)

The Jeffrey Epstein case is the context for the discussion about legal procedure and transparency.
A hypothetical hearing is discussed, with opinions on whether it should be held and whether victims should be allowed to speak.

Key Quotes (1)

"this is an odd moment for transparency in a criminal case."
Source
— two professors (A quote from an article in the New York Law Journal, relayed by the speaker in the transcript.)
DOJ-OGR-00000642.jpg
Quote #1

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document