| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
organization
BOIES SCHILLER FLEXNER LLP
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
FBI
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
USAO
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
OPR
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Unnamed speaker
|
Perpetrator victim |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Legal action | The government moved the Court to unseal grand jury materials without providing appropriate notic... | this Court | View |
| N/A | Hearing | A hypothetical hearing is discussed, with opinions on whether it should be held and whether victi... | N/A | View |
| 2022-07-22 | Court proceeding / sentencing | The speaker is being sentenced and makes a statement to the court and victims. | courtroom | View |
| 2019-01-01 | Meeting | Two of the victims referenced in the Indictment met with the prosecution's office for the first t... | N/A | View |
This legal document is a filing by the Government arguing against the defendant's motion to dismiss charges. The Government asserts that the charges are timely under the law, independent of a prior investigation, and that the defendant's claims are baseless. Furthermore, the document argues that the defendant poses an extreme flight risk due to her international ties, financial resources, and French citizenship, noting that France does not extradite its citizens to the U.S.
This document is a page from a court transcript where an unidentified speaker critiques an article from the New York Law Journal. The speaker refutes the opinions of two professors who argued against holding a public hearing and allowing victims to speak in the Jeffrey Epstein case, calling their suggestions 'incredulous' and incorrect as a matter of law.
This document is a page from a court transcript dated July 24, 2019, from case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB. In the transcript, a government lawyer, Mr. Rossmiller, argues before a judge for the pretrial detention of a defendant, citing an extraordinary risk of flight and danger to the community. Rossmiller states that for the sex trafficking offense charged, there is a legal presumption for detention which the defendant has not provided any information to rebut.
This document is a court transcript from July 22, 2022, containing a statement from an individual being sentenced in a case related to Jeffrey Epstein. The speaker, who claims to have never met Epstein but was associated with someone who did, apologizes to the victims for their pain and hopes their conviction brings closure. They express that Epstein is the one who should have faced prosecution years ago and lament the personal relationships they have lost due to the case.
Victims received notifications from the FBI and USAO regarding the federal investigation, Epstein's state plea, and the Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) before the NPA was signed.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity