DOJ-OGR-00008401.jpg
650 KB
Extraction Summary
8
People
7
Organizations
3
Locations
5
Events
5
Relationships
2
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal document
File Size:
650 KB
Summary
This document is a page from a legal filing, likely a court transcript or motion, dated December 17, 2021. The speaker argues against a defense strategy that challenges the thoroughness of a government investigation, citing multiple legal precedents (e.g., Watson, Gray v. Ercole, United States v. Birbal) to support the principle that the government's choice of investigative techniques is generally irrelevant to the defendant's guilt. The argument distinguishes these cases from another, Bowen v. Maynard, where evidence of an alternative suspect was deemed material.
People (8)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Watson | Party in a cited legal case |
Cited in the case 'Watson, 640 F.3d, 511-12'.
|
| Gray | Party in a cited legal case |
Cited in the case 'Gray v. Ercole'.
|
| Ercole | Party in a cited legal case |
Cited in the case 'Gray v. Ercole'.
|
| Birbal | Party in a cited legal case |
Cited in the case 'United States v. Birbal'.
|
| Duncan | Party in a cited legal case |
Cited in the case 'United States v. Duncan'.
|
| Aleynikov | Party in a cited legal case |
Cited in the case 'United States V. Aleynikov'.
|
| Bowen | Party in a cited legal case |
Cited in the case 'Bowen v. Maynard'.
|
| Maynard | Party in a cited legal case |
Cited in the case 'Bowen v. Maynard'.
|
Organizations (7)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Second Circuit | government agency |
Mentioned as the court that affirmed the decision in United States v. Birbal.
|
| District of the Vermont | government agency |
The court where the case United States v. Birbal was heard.
|
| E.D.N.Y | government agency |
Eastern District of New York, the court associated with the 'Gray v. Ercole' citation.
|
| S.D.N.Y. | government agency |
Southern District of New York, the court associated with the 'United States v. Duncan' and 'United States V. Aleyniko...
|
| 10th Circuit | government agency |
The court that held that Brady evidence was material in 'Bowen v. Maynard'.
|
| SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. | company |
Listed at the bottom of the page, likely the court reporting service that transcribed the document.
|
| United States | government agency |
Party in the cited cases 'United States v. Birbal', 'United States v. Duncan', and 'United States V. Aleynikov'.
|
Timeline (5 events)
1996
Legal case United States v. Birbal, 92 CR 98, 1996 WL 192924 is cited.
District of the Vermont
2011
Legal case United States V. Aleynikov, 785 F.Supp.2d 46, 65 is cited.
S.D.N.Y.
2019
Legal case United States v. Duncan, No. 18 CR 289, 2019 WL 2210663 is cited.
S.D.N.Y.
Relationships (5)
Parties in the cited case 'United States v. Birbal'.
Parties in the cited case 'United States v. Duncan'.
Parties in the cited case 'United States V. Aleynikov'.
Key Quotes (2)
"common method of undermining a prosecution"Source
— Other courts in this Circuit
(Describing challenges to the thoroughness of an investigation.)
DOJ-OGR-00008401.jpg
Quote #1
"The length of the investigation, the investigative techniques used, and the fact that the defendant was not initially a target of the investigation are all irrelevant pursuant to"Source
— Unnamed speaker quoting a legal principle
(Quoted to support the argument that the government's failure to use certain investigative techniques does not prove a defendant's innocence.)
DOJ-OGR-00008401.jpg
Quote #2
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document