HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022308.jpg
3.93 MB
Extraction Summary
1
People
9
Organizations
0
Locations
2
Events
3
Relationships
2
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Government publication (federal register page)
File Size:
3.93 MB
Summary
This document is a page from the Federal Register dated August 30, 2011, detailing a final rule by the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) regarding remedies for employers who fail to post notices of employee rights. The text addresses public comments on the proposed rule, clarifying that the remedies are not intended to be punitive, and includes a dissenting opinion from Board Member Brian E. Hayes who argues the NLRB is exceeding its statutory authority. The document is unrelated to Jeffrey Epstein; it is a legal and regulatory document concerning U.S. labor law.
People (1)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Brian E. Hayes | Member (of the NLRB) |
Authored a dissenting view (Section IV) on the new rule regarding unfair labor practices for employers.
|
Organizations (9)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) |
The primary agency discussed, referred to as "the Board," which is issuing a rule on employer notice-posting requirem...
|
|
| Republic Steel Corp. |
Party in a 1940 Supreme Court case (Republic Steel Corp. v. NLRB) cited regarding the Board's authority.
|
|
| Service Employees International Union |
Proposed an additional enforcement measure for the rule.
|
|
| United Food and Commercial Workers |
Proposed an additional enforcement measure for the rule.
|
|
| FMI |
An organization that submitted comments opposing the proposed rule (mentioned in footnote 169).
|
|
| ALFA |
An organization that submitted comments opposing the proposed rule (mentioned in footnote 169).
|
|
| AHCA |
An organization that submitted comments opposing the proposed rule (mentioned in footnote 169).
|
|
| U.S. Congress |
Mentioned in the dissenting view as the body with the authority to create the new obligation, not the NLRB.
|
|
| HOUSE_OVERSIGHT |
Appears in the footer as a document identifier (HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022308), possibly indicating the source is a collecti...
|
Timeline (2 events)
2011-08-30
Publication of a final rule by the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) in the Federal Register concerning remedies for an employer's failure to post a notice of employee rights.
United States
NLRB
Union organizing campaigns and representation elections, which are the context for the notice-posting requirements being discussed.
Workplaces in the United States
Employers
Employees
Unions
Relationships (3)
Section IV of the document is titled 'Dissenting View of Member Brian E. Hayes', where he argues against the majority's rule.
National Labor Relations Board (NLRB)
→
Regulatory
→
Employers
The entire document details a rule the NLRB is imposing on employers regarding the posting of employee rights notices.
Service Employees International Union
→
Petitioner/Commenter
→
National Labor Relations Board (NLRB)
The union proposed an additional enforcement scheme to the NLRB for its rule.
Key Quotes (2)
"Agencies may play the sorcerer’s apprentice but not the sorcerer himself."Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022308.jpg
Quote #1
"This seems to be yet another trap for the employers. Another avenue to subject them to law suits and interrogations, and uneconomic activities and ungodly expenditures."Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022308.jpg
Quote #2
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document