DOJ-OGR-00009446.jpg
340 KB
Extraction Summary
1
People
2
Organizations
1
Locations
4
Events
1
Relationships
0
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal document
File Size:
340 KB
Summary
This legal document from a New York court in 2010 details a ruling in the case of "In re Conrad." The court denies the respondent's motion for reinstatement to the practice of law but does so without prejudice, allowing for a future motion. The respondent remains suspended indefinitely, effective nunc pro tunc to December 18, 2007, but a previous finding of non-cooperation from that date is vacated.
People (1)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Conrad | Respondent |
Mentioned in the case name "In re Conrad" and referred to as "respondent" throughout the document concerning suspensi...
|
Organizations (2)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Court | Government Agency |
The judicial body that issued the order to suspend the respondent, deny the cross motion, and vacate a finding of non...
|
| Thomson Reuters | Company |
Mentioned in the copyright notice at the bottom of the page: "© 2011 Thomson Reuters."
|
Timeline (4 events)
Locations (1)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
The jurisdiction where the respondent was suspended from the practice of law.
|
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document