EFTA00032725.pdf
100 KB
Extraction Summary
7
People
3
Organizations
2
Locations
2
Events
2
Relationships
3
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Email chain
File Size:
100 KB
Summary
This document involves an internal email chain between U.S. Attorneys in the Southern District of New York (SDNY) regarding the Ghislaine Maxwell trial in June 2021. The prosecutors discuss legal strategy concerning a suppression hearing, noting that Maxwell's defense team filed 12 separate Memos of Law (MOLs) to bypass page limits. The correspondence also references past proceedings involving Judge Sweet and Judge McMahon, and requests access to original applications and transcripts.
People (7)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Ghislaine Maxwell | Defendant |
Subject of the suppression hearing and memos of law discussed.
|
| AJN | Judge |
Judge Alison J. Nathan (implied by initials AJN and context of Maxwell trial). Referenced in subject line and body as...
|
| Judge Sweet | Judge |
Referenced regarding an original application and potential transcript.
|
| Judge S | Judge |
Likely Judge Sweet, referenced regarding a lack of transcript.
|
| McMahon | Judge/Official |
Referenced regarding 'McMahon proceedings' and her opinion.
|
| Redacted Sender 1 | Associate U.S. Attorney |
SDNY attorney participating in the email chain.
|
| Redacted Sender 2 | Chief, Public Corruption Unit |
SDNY attorney initiating the discussion regarding the suppression hearing.
|
Organizations (3)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| USANYS |
U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (email domain/affiliation).
|
|
| Southern District of New York |
Jurisdiction handling the case.
|
|
| The Court |
Judicial body overseeing the case.
|
Timeline (2 events)
Upcoming (as of June 2021)
Locations (2)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Office location.
|
|
|
General location mentioned for a meeting.
|
Relationships (2)
Discussion of suppression hearing presiding judge.
Redacted Associate U.S. Attorney
→
Colleagues
→
Redacted Chief, Public Corruption Unit
Internal email correspondence regarding case strategy.
Key Quotes (3)
"She filed 12 (!!) separate MOLs as a way to evade the Court's page limits. Defense attorneys have started doing that over the last few years."Source
EFTA00032725.pdf
Quote #1
"Can I see our original application to Judge Sweet? And I assume there was no transcript before Judge S?"Source
EFTA00032725.pdf
Quote #2
"Judge Nathan has said that she will resolve the suppression motions 'at a later time' ahead of trial."Source
EFTA00032725.pdf
Quote #3
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document