McMahon
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Hussein bin Ali
|
Diplomatic correspondence |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
MAXWELL
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-06-01 | N/A | McMahon proceedings | Unknown | View |
| 2019-03-26 | Hearing | A hearing before Chief Judge McMahon. | N/A | View |
EFTA00032757.pdf
This document consists of an internal email chain within the U.S. Attorney's Office (SDNY) dated June 15-16, 2021, discussing the upcoming suppression hearing for Ghislaine Maxwell. The correspondence addresses legal strategy, including Maxwell's filing of 12 separate memos of law to evade page limits, and clarifies the identity of Stan Pottinger as a lawyer from Boies Schiller who represented a plaintiff in a related civil action. The emails also reference previous proceedings before Judge Sweet and Judge McMahon.
EFTA00032725.pdf
This document involves an internal email chain between U.S. Attorneys in the Southern District of New York (SDNY) regarding the Ghislaine Maxwell trial in June 2021. The prosecutors discuss legal strategy concerning a suppression hearing, noting that Maxwell's defense team filed 12 separate Memos of Law (MOLs) to bypass page limits. The correspondence also references past proceedings involving Judge Sweet and Judge McMahon, and requests access to original applications and transcripts.
EFTA00015277.pdf
This document is an email chain from June 2021 between US Attorneys in the Southern District of New York (SDNY) regarding the Ghislaine Maxwell case. They discuss preparation for a suppression hearing, exchange legal documents including transcripts from Judge Sweet and Magistrate Judge Netburn, and identify Stan Pottinger as a lawyer from Boies Schiller who represented a civil plaintiff. The prosecutors also express frustration with the defense filing 12 separate memos of law (MOLs) to evade page limits.
DOJ-OGR-00003042.jpg
This document is a legal filing, likely from the Government, arguing against a motion by a defendant named Maxwell to suppress evidence. The Government contends that Maxwell has no legal basis for suppression under the 'Martindell' precedent and that the court should decline to review a prior, coequal judge's (Chief Judge McMahon) decision to modify a protective order. The filing cites several Second Circuit cases to support its position that suppression is not the proper remedy and that pre-existing documents are not covered by the protective order's presumptions.
DOJ-OGR-00003034.jpg
This legal document details a ruling by Chief Judge McMahon concerning a government investigation related to a civil lawsuit between Giuffre and Maxwell. The judge concluded that Giuffre's law firm, Boies Schiller, did not improperly instigate the government's investigation and, due to "extraordinary circumstances," granted the government's request to access certain materials previously under a protective order. The ruling permitted the Government to share a specific court order with Boies Schiller to aid its investigation.
DOJ-OGR-00003033.jpg
This legal document describes a ruling made on April 9, 2019, by Chief Judge McMahon, who granted the Government's application to modify a protective order. The judge analyzed the case using Martindell factors and Second Circuit case law, concluding that while the order was necessary for Giuffre to depose Maxwell, Maxwell's reliance on it to shield information from law enforcement was unreasonable. Ultimately, the judge granted the government's application for modification.
DOJ-OGR-00003031.jpg
This legal document page, filed on April 16, 2021, details discussions from an April 9, 2019 hearing. Chief Judge McMahon questions the Government's request for materials from a civil libel case involving Maxwell, expressing concerns about potential criminal proceedings and the invocation of the Fifth Amendment. The judge also probes into prior contacts between the U.S. Attorney's Office (USAO-SDNY) and the law firm Boies Schiller related to the investigation.
DOJ-OGR-00002936.jpg
This document is the table of contents for a legal filing in case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, filed on April 16, 2021. The filing appears to be a response from the prosecution arguing against motions made by the defendant, Maxwell. Key arguments outlined include the irrelevance of Jeffrey Epstein's Non-Prosecution Agreement to this case, the timeliness of the indictment, and reasons why the defendant's motions to dismiss and suppress evidence should be denied.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023150.jpg
This document is a proof page from an Oxford University Press book dated December 9, 2014, titled 'A Chronology of the Arab-Israeli Conflict.' It lists historical events spanning from the First World War (1914) to the establishment of UNTSO (1948). The document bears the Bates stamp 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023150', indicating it was collected as evidence in a US House Oversight Committee investigation, likely as part of a larger document production.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity