DOJ-OGR-00021541.jpg
635 KB
Extraction Summary
2
People
6
Organizations
0
Locations
3
Events
2
Relationships
1
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal document
File Size:
635 KB
Summary
This legal document, filed on February 25, 2022, details a court's order regarding an inquiry into the truthfulness of answers provided by Juror 50. The court sets a deadline of March 1, 2022, for the parties to submit proposed questions for a hearing. The court denies the Defendant's broad subpoena requests for Juror 50's communications, social media history, and other records, labeling them a "vexatious, intrusive, unjustified, and a fishing expedition."
Organizations (6)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Court | Government Agency |
The judicial body that issued the order, set the scope of an inquiry, and denied the Defendant's subpoena requests.
|
| Government | Government Agency |
The opposing party to the Defendant, whose objections are mentioned in the document.
|
| Company |
One of the social media platforms from which the Defendant sought communications and other data related to Juror 50.
|
|
| Company |
One of the social media platforms from which the Defendant sought communications and other data related to Juror 50.
|
|
| Company |
One of the social media platforms from which the Defendant sought communications and other data related to Juror 50.
|
|
| Company |
One of the social media platforms from which the Defendant sought communications and other data related to Juror 50.
|
Timeline (3 events)
2022-03-01
Deadline for parties to submit proposed questions for the inquiry into Juror 50.
The parties
The Court
Relationships (2)
The Defendant sought extensive discovery from Juror 50, including emails, social media activity, and payment records, to investigate the truthfulness of the juror's answers during the trial.
The document mentions the Defendant provided a rebuttal to the Government's objections concerning the subpoena requests, indicating they are opposing parties in a legal proceeding.
Key Quotes (1)
"The Court denies these requests as vexatious, intrusive, unjustified, and a fishing expedition."Source
— The Court
(The Court's reasoning for denying the Defendant's broad subpoena requests for information about Juror 50.)
DOJ-OGR-00021541.jpg
Quote #1
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document