014.pdf

30.9 KB
View Original

Extraction Summary

15
People
7
Organizations
3
Locations
1
Events
4
Relationships
3
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Legal filing (response to motion)
File Size: 30.9 KB
Summary

This document is a legal response filed on August 22, 2008, by Jeffrey Epstein's legal team in the case of Jane Doe vs. Jeffrey Epstein, Haley Robson, and Sarah Kellen. Epstein's lawyers state they have no opposition to the plaintiff's Motion to Preserve Evidence (DE 12). However, they dispute the plaintiff's certification of compliance, arguing that plaintiff's counsel filed the motion prematurely without properly conferring with the defense or waiting for a return call regarding Epstein's position.

People (15)

Name Role Context
Jane Doe / Jane Doe #1 Plaintiff
Plaintiff in Case No. 08-80804-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON
Jeffrey Epstein Defendant
Primary defendant responding to the motion
Haley Robson Defendant
Co-defendant listed in case caption
Sarah Kellen Defendant
Co-defendant listed in case caption
Kathryn Meyers Attorney
Defense counsel for Epstein (Lewis Tein law firm); received call from plaintiff's counsel
Michael R. Tein Attorney
Defense counsel for Epstein; signer of the document
Guy A. Lewis Attorney
Defense counsel for Epstein
Jack A. Goldberger Attorney
Defense counsel for Epstein
Theodore J. Leopold Attorney
Counsel for Plaintiff Jane Doe
Spencer Kuvin Attorney
Counsel for Plaintiff Jane Doe
Douglas M. McIntosh Attorney
Counsel for Defendant Haley Robson
Jason A. McGrath Attorney
Counsel for Defendant Haley Robson
Bruce E. Reinhart Attorney
Counsel for Defendant Sarah Kellen
Robert D. Critton Attorney
Co-Counsel for Jeffrey Epstein
Michael J. Pike Attorney
Co-Counsel for Jeffrey Epstein

Organizations (7)

Name Type Context
United States District Court Southern District of Florida
Court where the case is filed
Lewis Tein, P.L.
Law firm representing Jeffrey Epstein
Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A.
Law firm representing Jeffrey Epstein
Ricci-Leopold, P.A.
Law firm representing Plaintiff Jane Doe
McIntosh, Sawran, Peltz & Cartaya, P.A.
Law firm representing Haley Robson
Bruce E. Reinhart, P.A.
Law firm representing Sarah Kellen
Burman, Critton, Luttier & Coleman, LLP
Law firm representing Jeffrey Epstein

Timeline (1 events)

2008-08-22
Filing of Epstein's Response to Motion to Preserve Evidence
Southern District of Florida

Locations (3)

Location Context
Address of Lewis Tein, P.L.
Address of various law firms involved
Address of Ricci-Leopold, P.A.

Relationships (4)

Jeffrey Epstein Legal Adversary Jane Doe
Plaintiff vs Defendant in case caption
Jeffrey Epstein Co-Defendants Haley Robson
Listed as defendants together
Jeffrey Epstein Co-Defendants Sarah Kellen
Listed as defendants together
Bruce E. Reinhart Attorney-Client Sarah Kellen
Service list identifies Reinhart as 'Counsel for Defendant Sarah Kellen'

Key Quotes (3)

"In fact, Epstein has no opposition to the relief requested."
Source
014.pdf
Quote #1
"That certification is inaccurate."
Source
014.pdf
Quote #2
"Plaintiff’s counsel - - without waiting to hear back from us - - electronically filed the motion, incorrectly certifying that we had actually opposed it."
Source
014.pdf
Quote #3

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document