DOJ-OGR-00021304.jpg

432 KB
View Original

Extraction Summary

10
People
4
Organizations
0
Locations
2
Events
2
Relationships
2
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Doj internal review / court filing exhibit
File Size: 432 KB
Summary

This document page outlines the Department of Justice hierarchy in early 2008 and details a specific period of review by the Child Exploitation and Obscenity Section (CEOS). It recounts a February 21, 2008 conversation where CEOS Chief Andrew Oosterbaan told attorney Lefkowitz that CEOS could take a 'fresh and objective look' at the case rather than partnering with the USAO, provided that would help the process move forward.

People (10)

Name Role Context
Alice Fisher Assistant Attorney General
Criminal Division hierarchy
Mark Filip Deputy Attorney General
Office of the Deputy Attorney General hierarchy
Andrew Lourie Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General
Criminal Division hierarchy (Until late Feb. 2008)
John Roth Senior Associate Deputy Attorney General
Office of the Deputy Attorney General hierarchy
Sigal Mandelker Deputy Assistant Attorney General
Criminal Division hierarchy
Andrew Oosterbaan Chief, CEOS
Criminal Division hierarchy; spoke with Lefkowitz and victims
Lefkowitz Attorney (implied defense)
Spoke with Oosterbaan about CEOS's role
Villafaña Recipient
Recipient of email from Oosterbaan
Sloman Recipient
Recipient of email from Oosterbaan
Senior Recipient
Recipient of email from Oosterbaan

Timeline (2 events)

February 21, 2008
CEOS Trial Attorney met with victims
Unknown
CEOS Trial Attorney Victims
February – May 15, 2008
Review by CEOS and the Criminal Division
DOJ
CEOS Criminal Division

Relationships (2)

Andrew Oosterbaan Professional/Adversarial Lefkowitz
Spoke regarding case strategy and CEOS role
Andrew Oosterbaan Hierarchical Sigal Mandelker
Org chart shows Oosterbaan reporting up to Mandelker

Key Quotes (2)

"I told [Lefkowitz] that all I want to do is help the process move forward, and if they think we best help the process by taking a fresh and objective look at the case and their arguments [then] that is what I want to do."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00021304.jpg
Quote #1
"I told him that if that’s what they want – if that is what will help the process to move forward – then I don’t think it’s advisable for CEOS to partner with the USAO on the case."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00021304.jpg
Quote #2

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document