Jeff Sloman
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Jeff Herman (Plaintiff's Lawyer)
|
Business associate |
7
|
1 | |
|
person
Marie Villafona
|
Superior subordinate |
7
|
1 | |
|
person
Alexander Acosta
|
Professional |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Author (Unspecified)
|
Academic citation |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Matthew Menchel
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Andrew Lourie
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Marie Villafaña
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Villafaña
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Villafaña
|
Supervisor subordinate |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Mr. Herman
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Alexander Acosta
|
Business associate |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Villafaña
|
Professional respect |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Alexander Acosta
|
Supporter defender |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Assistant U.S. Attorney
|
Business associate |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Roy Black
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2007-12-14 | N/A | Meeting between Epstein counsel, Alex Acosta, Jeff Sloman, the FBI SAC, and Marie Villafaña where... | Unknown | View |
| 2007-08-08 | N/A | "The meeting on Epstein" involving Acosta, Oosterbaan, and others. | Unknown | View |
001-01.pdf
This document contains the deposition transcript of 'Jane Doe' (a minor victim) dated February 20, 2008, and a Civil Complaint filed by her mother against Jeffrey Epstein, Haley Robson, and Sarah Kellen. The deposition covers Jane Doe's family issues, credibility, drug use allegations, and interactions with law enforcement, while the Complaint details the 'scheme' wherein Robson recruited underage girls for Epstein to sexually abuse under the guise of massages. The document also includes procedural filings regarding service of process on Haley Robson.
EFTA00020711.pdf
This document is a 'Second Supplemental Privilege Log' from the case Jane Doe v. United States, listing internal DOJ, FBI, and USAO communications withheld from civil discovery. The log chronicles the timeline of the Jeffrey Epstein investigation from late 2006 to August 2008, detailing the internal deliberations regarding the Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA), plea negotiations, and the drafting of the indictment. It reveals critical details such as internal disagreements over plea terms, Epstein's refusal to plead to anything other than 'assault on the plane,' Jay Lefkowitz's admission that he never intended Epstein to register as a sex offender, and the government's struggles with victim notification and harassment by Epstein's defense team.
EFTA00014008.pdf
An email exchange between personnel at the US Attorney's Office (USAFLS) dated June 30, 2008. An Assistant U.S. Attorney reports informing attorney Ted Leopold about the news regarding Jeffrey Epstein (likely the plea deal/jail sentence). Leopold indicated he represented three victims and was happy with the news. A colleague replies with congratulations on the case, referring to Epstein as a 'filthy rich bad guy going to jail' due to their dedication.
EFTA00013867.pdf
This document is an email chain from June 2008 involving Jack Goldberger, an Assistant U.S. Attorney, and other legal counsel (Roy and Jay Lefkowitz). The key content is a notification that the Deputy Attorney General determined federal prosecution of Jeffrey Epstein was appropriate. Epstein was given a deadline of June 30, 2008, to comply with a plea agreement that required him to plead guilty, be sentenced, and surrender for imprisonment.
EFTA00013865.pdf
This document is an email chain from June 2008 involving Roy Black, Jack Goldberger, and government officials (including a 'Marie' and references to Jeff Sloman and Jay Lefkowitz). The correspondence forwards a critical notification stating that the Deputy Attorney General determined federal prosecution of Jeffrey Epstein was appropriate. It sets a strict deadline of June 30, 2008, for Epstein to comply with a plea agreement, enter a guilty plea, and surrender for imprisonment.
EFTA00013721.pdf
This document is an email chain from January 30, 2008, between Jay Lefkowitz (Kirkland & Ellis) and U.S. Attorney Alex Acosta, which Acosta forwarded to an unidentified Assistant U.S. Attorney. Lefkowitz informs Acosta of a $50 million civil lawsuit filed against Epstein and states that they intend to depose a specific individual (name redacted) in response. The Assistant U.S. Attorney replies to Acosta's forward with the remark, 'Won't he be surprised when [Redacted] isn't part of the indictment,' implying that a key figure or the deposition target would not be facing federal charges.
DOJ-OGR-00023306.tif
This document, an excerpt from a legal report, discusses the handling of victim notification in the Jeffrey Epstein case, specifically focusing on the roles of Sloman, Villafaña, and PBPD Chief Reiter, and the subsequent review of prosecutor Acosta's actions by OPR. It analyzes whether federal victim notification laws (CVRA/VRRA) applied to state court proceedings and concludes that Acosta's deferral of victim notification to the State Attorney's Office did not constitute professional misconduct. Legal citations and quotes from individuals involved are provided to support the analysis.
DOJ-OGR-00021478.jpg
This legal document details the conflicting accounts between federal prosecutor Villafaña and victims' attorney Edwards concerning the notification for Jeffrey Epstein's June 30, 2008 state court guilty plea. Villafaña claims she encouraged Edwards to attend but was limited in what she could disclose, while Edwards claims he was misled about the plea's scope and its impact on federal prosecution possibilities under the NPA. The document also reveals internal government discussions about the method of victim notification, ultimately delegating the task to the Palm Beach Police Department.
DOJ-OGR-00021477.jpg
This legal document details communications surrounding the federal investigation of Epstein, focusing on the information provided to victims and their attorney, Bradley Edwards. Investigator Villafaña told victims and Edwards that the investigation was active and ongoing, while officials like Sloman and Acosta were concerned that disclosing the terms of a non-prosecution agreement (NPA), including a potential $150,000 payment, would compromise the victims' credibility as witnesses in a potential trial.
DOJ-OGR-00021433.jpg
This document outlines the internal DOJ communications in June 2008 regarding the finalization of Jeffrey Epstein's plea agreement and the handling of victim notifications. It details how prosecutor Villafaña was instructed by superiors Alex Acosta and Jeff Sloman to avoid direct victim notification, instead delegating that task to PBPD Chief Reiter. The text also confirms that the Deputy Attorney General had deemed federal prosecution appropriate just days before the plea deal deadline.
DOJ-OGR-00021406.jpg
This legal document details the aftermath of the signing of a Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) with Epstein, focusing on the U.S. Attorney's Office's (USAO) failure to notify victims. OPR's Oosterbaan disagreed with the USAO's decision on policy grounds, while USAO's Sloman believed notification was planned for a later date. Ultimately, despite initial plans by case agents to inform victims, Acosta decided to delay notification about the NPA and its monetary provisions until after Epstein's state guilty plea in June 2008, following objections from Epstein's defense counsel and internal concerns.
DOJ-OGR-00021353.jpg
This document is a page from an OPR report investigating the handling of the Jeffrey Epstein case, specifically focusing on the origins of the two-year plea deal. It details an allegation by prosecutor Villafaña that former First Assistant Jeff Sloman told her that prosecutor Matt Menchel pushed for the two-year deal as a personal favor ('do her a solid') to Epstein's defense attorney, Lilly Ann Sanchez. The report notes that OPR found no merit to this allegation, with Sloman testifying he did not recall making the remark seriously and did not believe Menchel would do such a thing.
DOJ-OGR-00021226.jpg
This document is a page from a DOJ OPR report detailing internal communications between federal prosecutors (Lourie, Menchel) regarding the initial prosecution memorandum for the Jeffrey Epstein case. It highlights the prosecutors' concerns about Epstein's high-profile defense team, the belief that state prosecutors intentionally sabotaged the case in the grand jury, and strategic discussions about selecting 'clean' victims to ensure a successful indictment. The document also notes Acosta's lack of recollection regarding reading the specific prosecution memo, citing his reliance on senior staff.
DOJ-OGR-00021207.jpg
This document is an investigative timeline detailing the roles and responsibilities within the USAO during the Jeffrey Epstein investigation from mid-2006 through mid-2009. It outlines key personnel like Alexander Acosta, Jeff Sloman, Matthew Menchel, Andrew Lourie, and Marie Villafaña, along with their positions. The timeline also highlights significant events including the opening of the federal investigation, the signing of an NPA, Epstein's guilty plea in state court, and his release from incarceration.
DOJ-OGR-00003228.jpg
This document contains an excerpt from a DOJ OPR report detailing internal communications regarding the initial federal investigation into Jeffrey Epstein. It highlights emails from prosecutor Lourie to Menchel discussing a 50-page prosecution memo, the strategy to use only 'clean victims' (those without impeachment baggage), and the assertion that the State Attorney's Office intentionally sabotaged their own grand jury case. The document also covers OPR interviews where Menchel recalls this as his introduction to the case, and then-US Attorney Alexander Acosta admits he likely did not read the prosecution memo, relying instead on his senior staff.
DOJ-OGR-00033084.jpg
This document is page 96 of a deposition transcript recorded by Censor & Associates. Attorney Mr. Tein is questioning a witness about their knowledge of communications between FBI agents, federal prosecutors (specifically Marie Villafona and Jeff Sloman), and other individuals (Mr. Leopold and Mr. Herman). The questioning specifically probes whether the witness knew if Mr. Herman was allowed to review or discuss a 'draft indictment' with federal prosecutors.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023130.jpg
This document, likely a House Oversight exhibit referencing a Miami Herald investigation, details the lenient treatment Jeffrey Epstein received from federal prosecutors. It highlights how prosecutors, specifically Marie Villafaña and Acosta, communicated privately with Epstein's defense team (led by Jay Lefkowitz) to avoid paper trails and agreed to keep the non-prosecution deal secret, effectively bypassing the Crime Victims Rights Act. The text contrasts the prosecutors' view of the crimes as a 'local sex case' with the victims' lawyer's assertion of international sex trafficking involving over 40 identified victims.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023128.jpg
This document appears to be a news article included in House Oversight Committee records (Bates stamped) discussing the scrutiny surrounding Alexander Acosta regarding the lenient plea deal he arranged for Jeffrey Epstein while U.S. Attorney in Florida. The text highlights Epstein's high-profile political connections (Trump, Clinton), the details of his 13-month jail sentence with work release, and a defense of Acosta written by an individual named Sloman. It concludes with a note about Epstein issuing a public apology to a lawyer rather than his victims.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013085.jpg
A page from an academic text regarding Artificial General Intelligence (AGI) and 'Naive Physics,' discussing theoretical environment design for AI learning. The document includes a diagram attributed to 'Sloman' regarding rubber bands and pins. It bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' Bates stamp, indicating it was obtained as part of a Congressional investigation, likely related to Epstein's connections to and funding of scientific research and AI.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013013.jpg
This document is page 97 of an academic paper titled 'An Architecture Diagram for Human-Like General Intelligence.' The text discusses theoretical models of Artificial General Intelligence (AGI), specifically comparing an 'integrative diagram' to the LIDA model and deep learning paradigms. It references a quote by Pascal and mentions 'Sloman's diagram' and 'CogPrime.' The document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013013' stamp, indicating it was part of a document dump related to the Epstein investigation, likely reflecting Epstein's interest in or funding of scientific research and transhumanism.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025359.jpg
This document is page 7 of a letter to Mark Filip dated May 19, 2008, detailing allegations of prosecutorial misconduct in the Jeffrey Epstein case. It describes Assistant U.S. Attorney David Weinstein leaking confidential plea negotiation details and prosecution theories to New York Times reporter Landon Thomas, while First Assistant Sloman denied the specificity of these leaks. The text criticizes the USAO for potential political and financial motivations and mentions a review by CEOS regarding U.S. Attorney Acosta's discretion in the prosecution.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012435.jpg
This document is a transcript from a legal deposition where an unidentified witness, a plaintiff in a fifty-million-dollar lawsuit against Epstein, is being questioned. The witness's attorney, Mr. Leopold, objects to questions regarding financial arrangements with their first lawyer, Jeff Herman, citing attorney-client privilege. The witness repeatedly denies knowing Jeff Sloman, despite being told he is a high-ranking prosecutor and the ex-partner of their lawyer, Jeff Herman.
Defense of Alexander Acosta
Called Acosta an outstanding public servant and stated he wouldn't let him become collateral damage.
Unknown
Question asked if FBI agents told witness these two had spoken. Witness answered 'No'.
Origin of the two-year plea deal
Sloman allegedly said Sanchez asked Menchel to 'do her a solid'.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity