Senior
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
organization
Civil Rights Division
|
Sender recipient of notification |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Associate Warden (MCC New York)
|
Business associate |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2008-02-28 | N/A | USAO sent written notification to Civil Rights Division regarding Epstein investigation. | N/A | View |
DOJ-OGR-00023141.tif
This document details the Department's review of the Epstein case from February to June 2008, initiated by Epstein's defense attorneys. It highlights internal discussions and notifications within the US justice system, including a February 28, 2008, notification from USAO Criminal Division Chief Senior to the Civil Rights Division regarding an ongoing child exploitation investigation involving Epstein. The notification, prepared by Villafaña and edited by Sloman, assessed the case as not being of "national interest" and anticipated charges under specific U.S. Code sections.
DOJ-OGR-00021304.jpg
This document page outlines the Department of Justice hierarchy in early 2008 and details a specific period of review by the Child Exploitation and Obscenity Section (CEOS). It recounts a February 21, 2008 conversation where CEOS Chief Andrew Oosterbaan told attorney Lefkowitz that CEOS could take a 'fresh and objective look' at the case rather than partnering with the USAO, provided that would help the process move forward.
DOJ-OGR-00021303.jpg
This page from a DOJ OPR report details the internal Department review between February and June 2008 regarding the Epstein case. It highlights that while Epstein's defense sought a broad review of misconduct and NPA terms, the DOJ only reviewed federal jurisdiction issues. The document also records a 'stand down' order where Oosterbaan instructed a CEOS attorney to cease involvement, and details the formal notification sent by the USAO to the Civil Rights Division classifying the case as 'child prostitution' rather than a matter of 'national interest.'
DOJ-OGR-00021302.jpg
This legal document details how prosecutor Acosta, responding to the defense's desire for a 'fresh face', engaged the Child Exploitation and Obscenity Section (CEOS) to review the evidence in the Epstein case. CEOS attorney Villafaña traveled to Florida, interviewed victims, and reported back to Acosta and Sloman on the victims' severe trauma and their desire for significant jail time for Epstein rather than restitution. The document also notes the CEOS Trial Attorney's assessment to OPR that the victim witnesses presented numerous challenges for a potential prosecution.
DOJ-OGR-00023142.jpg
This document is page 104 of a DOJ report detailing the organizational structure of the Criminal Division and the Office of the Deputy Attorney General in early 2008. It describes a specific interaction on February 21, 2008, where CEOS Chief Andrew Oosterbaan communicated with defense attorney Lefkowitz, offering to have CEOS take a 'fresh and objective look' at the case rather than partnering directly with the USAO. This conversation occurred shortly after a CEOS Trial Attorney had met with victims.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019531.jpg
This document appears to be a page (p. 43) from a book manuscript (likely by Edward Jay Epstein given the filename prefix 'Epst' and subject matter) produced as evidence for the House Oversight Committee. The text details Edward Snowden's attempts to secure a high-level Senior Executive Service (SES) position at the NSA in 2012 while working for Dell, his rejection of a lower-level G-13 offer in September 2012, and speculates on his motivations for seeking access to classified documents.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_020528.jpg
This document page details the challenges American think-tank scholars face in obtaining visas to China, noting a shift in review responsibility to the Ministry of Public Security which has caused delays and restrictions on activities. It describes how scholars sometimes leverage relationships with Chinese officials to secure visas, raising concerns about dependency. Additionally, it introduces the complex relationship between think tanks and Chinese media, highlighting issues of censorship and the media's intent to shape narratives favorably for China.
Tactics and Planning
Discussions regarding deployment and the Bar-Lev Line strategy.
Unknown
Expressing surprise that the recipient is at MCC, mentioning sending prayers to '[Redacted] and his crew' over the weekend due to 'difficult days'.
Unknown
Confirming they have been at MCC for almost 3 years, stating all is well and thanking for prayers.
Proposed Indictment
Submitted 'final final' proposed federal indictment of Epstein.
Recap of conversation with Lefkowitz
Oosterbaan explained his conversation with Lefkowitz regarding CEOS taking a fresh look at the case rather than partnering with USAO.
Recap of conversation with Lefkowitz
Explanation of the conversation with Lefkowitz regarding CEOS taking an objective look at the case.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity