017-11.pdf
125 KB
Extraction Summary
4
People
2
Organizations
1
Locations
3
Events
1
Relationships
5
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Court order (omnibus order)
File Size:
125 KB
Summary
This Omnibus Order from the U.S. District Court (Southern District of Florida), dated April 1, 2010, denies two motions filed by Jeffrey Epstein for reconsideration of previous orders. The court upholds previous rulings compelling Epstein to produce specific discovery materials, including his passport and tax returns (W-2s and 1099s for 2003-2008), rejecting his Fifth Amendment arguments under the 'foregone conclusion' doctrine and 'required records' exception. The order grants Epstein a ten-day window to file a formal appeal.
People (4)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Jane Doe No. 2 | Plaintiff |
Plaintiff in civil suit against Jeffrey Epstein
|
| Jeffrey Epstein | Defendant |
Defendant in civil suit; filed motions for reconsideration which are denied in this order
|
| Linnea R. Johnson | United States Magistrate Judge |
Judge who signed the Omnibus Order denying Epstein's motions
|
| Kenneth A. Marra | Judge |
Honorable Judge copied on the order
|
Organizations (2)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| United States District Court, Southern District of Florida |
Court issuing the order
|
|
| State and federal prosecutors |
Mentioned as the source of discovery materials in the criminal case against Epstein
|
Timeline (3 events)
2010-02-04
Magistrate's Order entered granting in part and denying in part Jane Doe's Motion to Compel.
Southern District of Florida
2010-03-04
Magistrate's Order entered regarding Epstein's Fifth Amendment privilege assertions.
Southern District of Florida
2010-04-01
Omnibus Order signed denying Epstein's motions for reconsideration.
West Palm Beach, Florida
Locations (1)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Location of Chambers where the order was signed
|
Relationships (1)
Plaintiff vs Defendant in Case No. 08-CIV-80119-MARRA/JOHNSON
Key Quotes (5)
"The Court stands behind each of these decisions for the reasons stated in its Order and is not persuaded by any of Epstein’s arguments to the contrary."Source
017-11.pdf
Quote #1
"Specifically Epstein takes issue with that portion of the Order which compelled production of discovery from state and federal prosecutors in the criminal case against him, his recent tax returns, and his passport."Source
017-11.pdf
Quote #2
"Epstein’s primary objection was based on the Fifth Amendment, which the undersigned overruled on the basis of the “foregone conclusion” doctrine"Source
017-11.pdf
Quote #3
"Production Request Number 1 seeking all federal and state tax returns, including all W-2 forms and 1099 forms and schedules for the five year period from 2003-2008."Source
017-11.pdf
Quote #4
"Defendant Epstein’s Motion For Reconsideration... is DENIED."Source
017-11.pdf
Quote #5
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document