Kenneth A. Marra
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Alexander Acosta
|
Judicial |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
JOHNSON
|
Judicial review |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
James I. Cohn
|
Business associate |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Judge litigant |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Kenneth L. Ryskamp
|
Professional judicial |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Linnea R. Johnson
|
Business associate |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Linnea R. Johnson
|
Professional |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Kenneth L. Ryskamp
|
Business associate |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
William J. Zloch
|
Business associate |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Defendant judge |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Susan H. Black
|
Judicial review |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Alex Acosta
|
Judicial |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Jane Doe No. 4
|
Judge presiding over case involving |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Epstein
|
Judge presiding over case involving |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-11-17 | N/A | Federal judge ruled the plea deal violated the Crime Victims' Rights Act. | U.S. District Court | View |
| 2021-10-15 | N/A | Court Order Issued | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2019-06-01 | N/A | Judge Marra ruling on Crime Victims' Rights Act violation | Federal Court | View |
| 2019-02-25 | N/A | Judge Kenneth A. Marra ruled prosecutors violated the Crime Victims' Rights Act. | South Florida | View |
| 2019-02-21 | N/A | Federal judge rules DOJ broke the law regarding Epstein's plea deal. | Florida | View |
| 2019-02-01 | N/A | Ruling by U.S. District Judge Kenneth A. Marra finding Acosta misled Epstein victims. | Southern District of Florida | View |
| 2019-01-01 | N/A | U.S. District Judge Kenneth A. Marra ruled that federal prosecutors broke the law regarding the E... | South Florida | View |
| 2019-01-01 | N/A | Judge Marra ruled that prosecutors mishandled the Epstein case. | Unknown | View |
| 2015-04-15 | N/A | Order Denying Intervenor's Motion for a Protective Order issued by Judge Marra. | West Palm Beach, FL | View |
| 2015-04-06 | N/A | Judge Marra issues order denying joinder and striking impertinent details. | West Palm Beach | View |
| 2010-07-20 | N/A | Final Order of Dismissal with Prejudice filed | West Palm Beach, Florida | View |
| 2010-07-20 | N/A | Final Order of Dismissal with Prejudice issued | West Palm Beach, Florida | View |
| 2010-06-30 | N/A | Judge Marra denies Defendant's motion to redact tax records. | Court | View |
| 2010-06-30 | N/A | Final Order of Dismissal with Prejudice entered | West Palm Beach, Florida | View |
| 2010-06-30 | N/A | Judge Marra signs order granting motion for open trial and to identify Jane Doe. | Court | View |
| 2010-06-29 | N/A | Order granting Motion for Leave to File Excess Pages signed by Judge Marra. | Court | View |
| 2010-06-25 | N/A | Order Affirming Magistrate Judge Johnson's Discovery Orders signed by Judge Marra. | West Palm Beach, Florida | View |
| 2010-06-25 | N/A | Final Order of Dismissal with Prejudice issued, closing the case | West Palm Beach, Florida | View |
| 2010-06-24 | N/A | Final Order of Dismissal with Prejudice signed and case closed | West Palm Beach, Florida | View |
| 2010-06-24 | N/A | Final Order of Dismissal with Prejudice entered on FLSD Docket. | Palm Beach County Courthous... | View |
| 2010-06-14 | N/A | Judge Kenneth A. Marra signs Order of Reference referring pretrial discovery motions to Magistrat... | West Palm Beach, Florida | View |
| 2010-05-19 | N/A | Final Order of Dismissal with Prejudice issued, closing the case following a settlement. | West Palm Beach, Florida | View |
| 2010-05-18 | N/A | Final Order of Dismissal with Prejudice entered, closing the case based on a settlement. | Southern District of Florida | View |
| 2010-04-29 | N/A | Order requiring counsel to confer and file joint reports signed by Judge Kenneth A. Marra. | West Palm Beach, Florida | View |
| 2010-04-27 | N/A | Judge Marra accepts transfer of case | Southern District of Florida | View |
017-18.pdf
This document is a page from a court docket covering filings on June 29 and 30, 2010, in the case of Jane Doe vs. Jeffrey Epstein (Case 9:10-cv-81111-WPD). Key entries include orders by Judge Kenneth A. Marra granting an open trial and identifying Jane Doe, as well as denying Epstein's request to redact tax records. It also lists motions by Epstein's defense regarding jury selection, sequestration, and a request to continue the trial, alongside Plaintiff's motion for a writ regarding witness Alfredo Rodriguez.
017-14.pdf
Order from the U.S. District Court (S.D. Florida) dated June 25, 2010, denying Jeffrey Epstein's appeal of Magistrate Judge Johnson's discovery orders. Epstein is ordered to produce documents within three days, with specific instructions to redact names of minor sexual assault victims. The order also restricts the Plaintiff from disclosing Epstein's tax returns or passport to third parties, except for expert witnesses bound by confidentiality.
017-11.pdf
This Omnibus Order from the U.S. District Court (Southern District of Florida), dated April 1, 2010, denies two motions filed by Jeffrey Epstein for reconsideration of previous orders. The court upholds previous rulings compelling Epstein to produce specific discovery materials, including his passport and tax returns (W-2s and 1099s for 2003-2008), rejecting his Fifth Amendment arguments under the 'foregone conclusion' doctrine and 'required records' exception. The order grants Epstein a ten-day window to file a formal appeal.
017-08.pdf
This is a court order from the Southern District of Florida dated February 11, 2010, in the case of Jane Doe No. 2 vs. Jeffrey Epstein. Judge Kenneth A. Marra grants in part Epstein's motion for an extension, setting a new deadline of February 26, 2010, for Epstein to appeal Magistrate Judge Johnson's prior order compelling document production. The order also stipulates that if the appeal fails, Epstein must produce the documents within three business days.
017-05.pdf
This document is an Omnibus Order from the US District Court for the Southern District of Florida dated February 4, 2010, in the civil case of Jane Doe No. 2 vs. Jeffrey Epstein. The Magistrate Judge rules on the Plaintiff's motions to compel answers to interrogatories, admissions, and production requests. The court upholds Epstein's Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination regarding questions about his financial history, assets, and potential witnesses, but orders him to produce documents that are already known to the government (tax returns, passport, and documents provided to him during plea negotiations), ruling that these fall under the 'foregone conclusion' doctrine.
016-06.pdf
This document is a court order dated July 1, 2010, from the Southern District of Florida in the case of Jane Doe v. Jeffrey Epstein. Judge Peter R. Palermo grants the plaintiff's motion to modify the scheduling of a settlement conference set for July 6, 2010, to ensure Jane Doe does not come into contact with Epstein, citing existing no-contact orders. The order stipulates specific arrival times for Epstein (8:30 AM), dismissal procedures, and explicitly forbids communication or harassment between the parties.
022.pdf
A Final Order of Dismissal with Prejudice from the U.S. District Court, Southern District of Florida, in the case of L.M. v. Jeffrey Epstein (Case No. 09-CIV-81092). Judge Kenneth A. Marra dismissed the case on July 20, 2010, following a stipulation by the parties, while noting that the court retains jurisdiction to enforce the terms of a settlement reached between the plaintiff and Epstein.
021-01.pdf
This document is a Final Order of Dismissal with Prejudice from the U.S. District Court, Southern District of Florida, dated July 20, 2010. Judge Kenneth A. Marra dismissed the civil case (09-CIV-81092) brought by plaintiff L.M. against Jeffrey Epstein following a settlement agreement between the parties. The court retained jurisdiction specifically to enforce the terms of said settlement.
020.pdf
This document is a Motion to Dismiss filed by Jeffrey Epstein's legal team on June 16, 2010, in the case of L.M. v. Epstein. Epstein's lawyers argue the case should be dismissed because the plaintiff failed to serve the complaint within the required 120 days (Rule 4(m)). Furthermore, the motion alleges that the complaint filed by L.M. (represented by Bradley Edwards) was used as a prop in Scott Rothstein's massive $1.2 billion Ponzi scheme to lure investors with fabricated settlement agreements. The document cites depositions where L.M. contradicts allegations made in her complaint regarding sexual acts and travel.
020-01.pdf
This document contains a series of court orders and motions from the case *Morse v. Jan Jones International, Inc.* (Case 9:09-cv-81092-KAM) in the Southern District of Florida. The Plaintiffs, represented by Scott Rothstein, successfully argued that Jan Jones committed fraud and illegally moved funds to the Cayman Islands, resulting in an order for over $23 million in damages and the seizure of assets. The document includes a Stipulated Confidentiality Order and a subsequent Order on Emergency Writ of Mandamus from the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals, which reinstated the District Court's orders and mandated review by the Department of Treasury and FBI due to the sensitive nature of the government's investigation.
005.pdf
Court order from the Southern District of Florida in the case of L.M. vs. Jeffrey Epstein (Case No. 09-81092-CIV-MARRA), signed by Judge Kenneth A. Marra on July 30, 2009. The order outlines procedural requirements for counsel to confer and file joint scheduling and discovery reports in accordance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
004.pdf
A court order from the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida transferring civil case 09-81092 (L.M. v. Jeffrey Epstein) from Judge James I. Cohn to Judge Kenneth A. Marra. The order was signed by Judge Cohn on July 28, 2009, and accepted by Judge Marra on July 29, 2009, citing Internal Operating Procedure 2.15.C.
011.pdf
This document is a legal reply letter dated December 16, 2019, from attorneys representing Alan Dershowitz to Judge Naomi Reice Buchwald. Dershowitz seeks to intervene in the civil case *Maria Farmer v. Estate of Jeffrey Epstein* to strike specific allegations in the complaint he deems scandalous and irrelevant, and to request sanctions against Farmer and her legal team (Boies Schiller Flexner LLP). The letter argues that the allegations against Dershowitz have no bearing on Farmer's claims of battery and emotional distress against the Epstein Estate and are part of a 'campaign of personal animus'.
009.pdf
This document is a letter from Alan Dershowitz's legal counsel to Judge Naomi Reice Buchwald requesting a pre-motion conference to intervene in the civil case 'Maria Farmer v. Estate of Jeffrey Epstein'. Dershowitz seeks to strike paragraph 39 of Farmer's complaint, which alleges she saw him at Epstein's New York mansion going upstairs with young girls brought by Ghislaine Maxwell. Dershowitz argues this allegation is demonstrably false based on chronology (claiming he didn't meet Epstein until after Farmer left) and is legally irrelevant to the estate case, serving only to defame him.
010-11.pdf
This is a court order from September 2014 in the case of Jane Doe v. United States, concerning Jeffrey Epstein's intervention. Judge Kenneth Marra granted in part and denied in part Epstein's motion for a protective order regarding correspondence between his lawyers and the US Attorney's Office. While the court agreed to restrict dissemination of materials to the press to avoid publicity in this 'high profile' case, it rejected Epstein's request to automatically require court permission to seal every future filing.
010-10.pdf
This document is a Court Order from the Southern District of Florida, dated April 15, 2015, denying Jeffrey Epstein's motion for a supplemental protective order. Epstein sought to keep correspondence between his lawyers and the US Government regarding his non-prosecution agreement sealed from the public. Judge Kenneth Marra ruled that the public interest in determining if the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA) was violated outweighs Epstein's desire for confidentiality, stating that plea negotiations are not privileged.
010-03.pdf
This is a court order from Judge Kenneth A. Marra denying motions by Jane Doe 3 and Jane Doe 4 to join an existing lawsuit filed by Jane Doe 1 and 2 against the US Government regarding violations of the Crime Victims' Rights Act in the Epstein case. The judge ruled that adding new parties was unnecessary as their claims were duplicative and they could instead serve as witnesses. Significantly, the Judge sua sponte ordered the striking of 'lurid details' and allegations made by Jane Doe 3 regarding being trafficked to high-profile non-parties (including politicians and world leaders), deeming them impertinent to the specific legal claim against the government. Consequently, Alan Dershowitz's motion to intervene to strike these same allegations was denied as moot.
080-01.pdf
This document is a Final Order of Dismissal with Prejudice from the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida, dated June 2010 (entered on docket June 30, 2010). Judge Kenneth A. Marra dismissed the case brought by Plaintiff Jane Doe II against Defendants Jeffrey Epstein and Sarah Kellen following a settlement stipulation by the parties. The court retained jurisdiction specifically to enforce the terms of said settlement.
074.pdf
An Omnibus Order from the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida in the case of Jane Doe No. 2 v. Jeffrey Epstein. The order, signed by Magistrate Judge Linnea R. Johnson, addresses eight specific motions filed between March and November 2009 across multiple related case numbers. Most motions were stricken for not being filed in the Lead Case No. 08-80119, while one defendant motion was granted nunc pro tunc and a third-party motion by 'Zinoview' was denied as moot.
056-01.pdf
A court order from the Southern District of Florida dated August 2009 in the case of Jane Doe II vs. Jeffrey Epstein and Sarah Kellen. Judge Kenneth A. Marra grants Sarah Kellen's request to adopt co-defendant Jeffrey Epstein's Motion to Dismiss and Reply as her own arguments in the case.
039.pdf
A court order from the Southern District of Florida dated June 16, 2009, granting a default judgment against Sarah Kellen in a civil case filed by Jane Doe II. Judge Kenneth A. Marra ruled that Kellen failed to respond to the complaint despite being properly served under New York state law. Jeffrey Epstein is listed as a co-defendant in the case header.
006.pdf
This document is a Court Order from the United States District Court Southern District of Florida, dated April 28, 2009, presided over by Judge Kenneth A. Marra. The order grants the Plaintiffs' motion for a protective order against piecemeal depositions, limiting Jeffrey Epstein (Defendant) to a single deposition of each plaintiff across ten related civil cases. It also consolidates four specific cases (08-80119, 08-80232, 08-80380, and 08-80993) for the purposes of discovery and orders parties in the remaining six cases to show cause why they should not also be consolidated.
005.pdf
This document is a court order from March 30, 2009, in the case of Jane Doe II vs. Jeffrey Epstein and Sara Kellen (Case No. 09-80469-CIV-MARRA) in the Southern District of Florida. Judge Kenneth A. Marra orders counsel to confer and file a joint scheduling and discovery report pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The order outlines specific deadlines for pretrial discovery planning and scheduling conferences.
004.pdf
This document is an Order of Transfer from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida, dated March 2009. Judge Kenneth L. Ryskamp transfers the case of Jane Doe II v. Jeffrey Epstein and Sarah Kellen (Case No. 09-80469) to Judge Kenneth A. Marra. The transfer is ordered because the case is related to several lower-numbered cases already assigned to Judge Marra (including 08-80069, 08-80119, etc.).
026.pdf
This document is an October 2008 court order granting a motion to remand the civil case 'Jane Doe v. Jeffrey Epstein, Haley Robson, and Sarah Kellen' back to state court. The federal judge ruled that the plaintiff had valid state-law claims (civil conspiracy, etc.) against defendant Haley Robson, a Florida resident, meaning her inclusion in the lawsuit was not 'fraudulent joinder' intended solely to defeat federal diversity jurisdiction. The order details the plaintiff's allegations that Robson recruited her at age 14 from Loxahatchee, Kellen managed the encounter, and Epstein sexually abused her at his Palm Beach mansion.
Acceptance of Transfer
Judge Marra accepts the transfer and updates the case number suffix to MARRA.
Order of Transfer
Transferring case 09-81092 to Judge Marra's calendar pursuant to Internal Operating Procedure 2.15.C.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity