DOJ-OGR-00005733.jpg
736 KB
Extraction Summary
7
People
4
Organizations
0
Locations
2
Events
2
Relationships
4
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Court filing / legal memorandum (motion in limine/suppression argument)
File Size:
736 KB
Summary
This document is page 8 of a legal filing (Document 391) from the Ghislaine Maxwell trial, dated October 29, 2021. The defense argues that admitting seized evidence based on the affidavit of Detective Recarey violates Maxwell's Sixth Amendment rights because Recarey (the original custodian) is dead and unavailable for cross-examination. The text emphasizes that no other witness has sufficient personal knowledge of the seized items, their storage, or the 'confusing' handwritten notes in the inventory.
People (7)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Ghislaine Maxwell | Defendant |
The document argues for her Sixth Amendment rights to confront witnesses.
|
| Detective Recarey | Witness/Affiant (Deceased/Unavailable) |
Lead detective whose affidavit (Exhibit 295) is being challenged because he is unavailable for cross-examination rega...
|
| Recarey | Detective |
Identified as the only person familiar with the items seized, their content, storage, and disposition.
|
| Natale | Case Citation Name |
Referenced in United States v. Natale regarding evidence authenticity.
|
| Netschi | Case Citation Name |
Referenced in United States v. Netschi regarding foundation for email evidence.
|
| Muhanad Mahmoud Al-Farekh | Case Citation Name |
Referenced in case law regarding cross-examination limitations.
|
| Coy | Case Citation Name |
Referenced in Coy v. Iowa regarding 'face-to-face' confrontation rights.
|
Organizations (4)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| United States District Court |
Implied by the case caption format (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE).
|
|
| Second Circuit Court of Appeals |
Referenced as '2d Cir.' in case citations.
|
|
| Supreme Court |
Referenced regarding the history of the Confrontation Clause.
|
|
| Department of Justice (DOJ) |
Referenced in the footer stamp 'DOJ-OGR-00005733'.
|
Timeline (2 events)
Relationships (2)
Recarey seized items relevant to Maxwell's prosecution; Maxwell's defense is challenging the use of his affidavit.
The admission of the seized evidence is based on Government Exhibit 295, the affidavit of Detective Recarey.
Key Quotes (4)
"Here, the original custodian of the evidence is dead and unavailable to testify at trial."Source
DOJ-OGR-00005733.jpg
Quote #1
"Detective Recarey’s Absence Implicates Ms. Maxwell’s Right to Confront and Cross-Examine Witnesses"Source
DOJ-OGR-00005733.jpg
Quote #2
"Only Detective Recarey was familiar with the items seized, the content of the items seized, how the items were stored, and the disposition of those items."Source
DOJ-OGR-00005733.jpg
Quote #3
"The handwritten notes contained in the inventory are confusing and hearsay."Source
DOJ-OGR-00005733.jpg
Quote #4
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document