DOJ-OGR-00009843.jpg
783 KB
Extraction Summary
4
People
3
Organizations
1
Locations
2
Events
2
Relationships
5
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Court filing / legal brief (government response)
File Size:
783 KB
Summary
This document is a page from a Government filing in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330), dated March 11, 2022. It discusses a dispute regarding 'Juror 50', who has requested access to his own voir dire transcript and juror questionnaire; the defense opposes this, arguing it would prejudice the investigation into the juror's conduct, while the government supports the juror's right to access a document he authored. The text also references a separate motion by The New York Times to unseal juror questionnaires.
People (4)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Juror 50 | Juror / Subject of Inquiry |
Subject of a post-trial investigation regarding juror conduct; requesting access to his own questionnaire and voir di...
|
| Juror 50's Counsel | Attorney |
Representing Juror 50 in the motion to acquire documents.
|
| The Defendant | Defendant |
Opposing Juror 50's request; implied to be Ghislaine Maxwell based on case number 1:20-cr-00330.
|
| The Government | Prosecution |
Submits that Juror 50 should receive a copy of his own questionnaire.
|
Organizations (3)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| The New York Times Company |
Moved to unseal juror questionnaires on January 24, 2022.
|
|
| Department of Justice (DOJ) |
Indicated by Bates stamp DOJ-OGR-00009843.
|
|
| Supreme Court |
Cited in legal precedents (U.S. citations).
|
Timeline (2 events)
2022-01-24
Locations (1)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Mentioned in case citation Press-Enter. Co. v. Superior Ct. of California.
|
Relationships (2)
The defendant opposes Juror 50’s request for his questionnaire.
Government submits that Juror 50 should get a copy of his own questionnaire.
Key Quotes (5)
"The defendant opposes Juror 50’s request, describing it as a 'discovery request' and claiming that the release of Juror 50’s questionnaire would prejudice the 'investigation' of Juror 50’s 'conduct'"Source
DOJ-OGR-00009843.jpg
Quote #1
"undoubtably color Juror No. 50’s testimony and allow him to place himself in the best possible posture."Source
DOJ-OGR-00009843.jpg
Quote #2
"Juror 50 is not a defendant and he is not seeking discovery."Source
DOJ-OGR-00009843.jpg
Quote #3
"He is asking for access to his questionnaire: a document that he himself prepared and swore under penalty of perjury"Source
DOJ-OGR-00009843.jpg
Quote #4
"The privacy concerns that otherwise might require limiting access to Juror 50’s questionnaire plainly do not apply to Juror 50 himself or his counsel."Source
DOJ-OGR-00009843.jpg
Quote #5
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document