DOJ-OGR-00000317.jpg

805 KB
View Original

Extraction Summary

2
People
6
Organizations
2
Locations
1
Events
1
Relationships
4
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Legal brief / court filing
File Size: 805 KB
Summary

This document is a page from a legal filing (likely by the DOJ) arguing that the Petitioners' claims are unripe. The government contends that the Petitioners are not precluded from conferring with government attorneys in other districts about pursuing charges against Epstein not covered by the Non-Prosecution Agreement. It cites case law to support the dismissal of claims based on future, hypothetical events.

People (2)

Name Role Context
Epstein Defendant
Subject of potential federal criminal charges and a Non-Prosecution Agreement
Petitioners Plaintiffs/Victims
Seeking to confer with government attorneys regarding charges against Epstein

Organizations (6)

Name Type Context
United States Attorney’s Office for the Middle District of Florida
Mentioned in footnote regarding recusal-based prosecutorial responsibilities
United States Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of Florida
Implied as the office bound by the Non-Prosecution Agreement
Association for Children for Enforcement of Support, Inc.
Cited in case law
Greenbriar, Ltd.
Cited in case law
City of Alabaster
Cited in case law
11th Cir.
Court of Appeals circuit cited in case law

Timeline (1 events)

2008-07-11
Hearing Transcript (Hr’g Tr.) cited where Petitioners agreed the best they can get is the right to confer
Court

Locations (2)

Location Context
Jurisdiction where the Non-Prosecution Agreement applies
Alternative jurisdiction mentioned in footnote

Relationships (1)

Petitioners Victim/Accused Epstein
Petitioners seeking criminal charges against Epstein

Key Quotes (4)

"Nothing precludes Petitioners from doing so, and there is nothing to indicate that Petitioners’ wishes to confer with government attorneys in those districts would be rebuffed in any way."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00000317.jpg
Quote #1
"Indeed, it would be rank speculation by Petitioners to contend otherwise."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00000317.jpg
Quote #2
"a claim that Petitioners have been denied the opportunity to confer with the attorney for the government about the filing and disposition of criminal charges against Epstein is premature and constitutionally unripe."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00000317.jpg
Quote #3
"the Non-Prosecution Agreement would constrain the possible filing of federal charges by that office in the Southern District of Florida."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00000317.jpg
Quote #4

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document