Trove
Sign In Get Started

DOJ-OGR-00001826.jpg

1.04 MB
View Original

Extraction Summary

2
People
3
Organizations
1
Locations
5
Events
1
Relationships
6
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Court document / legal opinion
File Size: 1.04 MB
Summary

This document discusses a legal appeal by 'Maxwell' concerning the denial of her motion to modify a protective order and her request for a writ of mandamus to the District Court. The court declines to exercise jurisdiction and dismisses the appeal, also denying her request for a writ of mandamus and her motions to consolidate her criminal appeal with a civil appeal involving Guiffre v. Maxwell, citing lack of common identity between the appeals.

People (2)

Name Role Context
Maxwell Appellant/Defendant
Appeals from denial of motion to modify a protective order; seeks writ of mandamus; seeks to consolidate appeals.
Guiffre Party in civil appeal
Plaintiff in Guiffre v. Maxwell civil appeal.

Organizations (3)

Name Type Context
Supreme Court
Identified circumstances in criminal cases for exceptions.
District Court
Ordered to modify protective order; alleged to have usurped power or abused discretion.
DOJ
Department of Justice (implied by document number DOJ-OGR-00001826)

Timeline (5 events)

Maxwell appeals denial of motion to modify a protective order.
Maxwell
View
Maxwell seeks writ of mandamus to direct District Court to modify protective order.
Maxwell
View
Court declines to issue writ of mandamus.
Court
View
Maxwell seeks to consolidate her criminal appeal with civil appeal Guiffre v. Maxwell, No. 20-2413-cv.
Maxwell Guiffre
View
Court denies Maxwell's motions to consolidate as moot.
Court Maxwell
View

Locations (1)

Location Context
City of New York
Cited in In re City of New York case.

Relationships (1)

Maxwell → litigants in a civil appeal → Guiffre
Guiffre v. Maxwell, No. 20-2413-cv

Key Quotes (6)

""delaying review until the entry of a final judgment would imperil a substantial public interest or some particular value of a high order""
Source
DOJ-OGR-00001826.jpg
Quote #1
""discovery orders allegedly adverse to a claim of privilege or privacy""
Source
DOJ-OGR-00001826.jpg
Quote #2
""the right of a criminal defendant to disclose information given to [her] in discovery""
Source
DOJ-OGR-00001826.jpg
Quote #3
""only in exceptional circumstances amounting to a judicial usurpation of power or a clear abuse of discretion.""
Source
DOJ-OGR-00001826.jpg
Quote #4
""[M]ere error, even gross error in a particular case, as distinguished from a calculated and repeated disregard of governing rules, does not suffice to support issuance of the writ.""
Source
DOJ-OGR-00001826.jpg
Quote #5
""bear[s] the burden of showing the commonality of factual and legal issues in different actions.""
Source
DOJ-OGR-00001826.jpg
Quote #6

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document