DOJ-OGR-00020324.jpg

563 KB
View Original

Extraction Summary

5
People
3
Organizations
1
Locations
3
Events
1
Relationships
4
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Court order / court of appeals ruling
File Size: 563 KB
Summary

This document is a ruling from the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit dated April 27, 2021. The court affirmed previous District Court orders denying bail for Ghislaine Maxwell and denied her motion for temporary pretrial release. The court also noted complaints regarding Maxwell's sleep deprivation while incarcerated, directing her counsel to address those specific conditions with the District Court.

People (5)

Name Role Context
Ghislaine Maxwell Defendant-Appellant
Appealing district court orders denying bail; AKA Sealed Defendant 1
Pierre N. Leval Circuit Judge
Judge present for the ruling
Raymond J. Lohier, Jr. Circuit Judge
Judge present for the ruling
Richard J. Sullivan Circuit Judge
Judge present for the ruling
Catherine O’Hagan Wolfe Clerk of Court
Signed the order on behalf of the court

Organizations (3)

Name Type Context
United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Issuing court
United States of America
Opposing party in the case
District Court
Court that issued the original orders being appealed

Timeline (3 events)

2020-12-28
District Court entered order denying bail request
District Court
2021-03-22
District Court entered order denying renewed bail request
District Court
2021-04-27
US Court of Appeals affirms District Court orders and denies bail motion
Thurgood Marshall United States Courthouse, NY

Locations (1)

Location Context
Location where the court term was held

Relationships (1)

Ghislaine Maxwell Legal Adversaries United States of America
Listed as Defendant-Appellant vs Appellee in case 21-58-cr

Key Quotes (4)

"Defendant-Appellant Ghislaine Maxwell appeals from orders of the District Court... which denied her renewed requests for bail pending trial."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00020324.jpg
Quote #1
"it is hereby ORDERED that the District Court’s orders are AFFIRMED and that Appellant’s motion for bail... is DENIED."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00020324.jpg
Quote #2
"counsel for Appellant expressed concern that Appellant was improperly being deprived of sleep while incarcerated."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00020324.jpg
Quote #3
"To the extent Appellant seeks relief specific to her sleeping conditions, such request should be addressed to the District Court."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00020324.jpg
Quote #4

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document