DOJ-OGR-00004878.jpg
815 KB
Extraction Summary
10
People
4
Organizations
2
Locations
0
Events
2
Relationships
4
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal filing / court opinion exhibit
File Size:
815 KB
Summary
This document is a page from a legal filing in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell), filed on July 2, 2021. The text appears to be an excerpt from a Pennsylvania Supreme Court opinion (*Commonwealth v. Taylor*) discussing the Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination, citing various U.S. Supreme Court precedents to argue that the privilege applies broadly in both criminal and civil/administrative proceedings. The document emphasizes that the right accompanies a person regardless of the legal proceeding type.
People (10)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Douglas, J. | Justice (Supreme Court) |
Quoted in dissenting opinion in Ullmann v. United States regarding the Fifth Amendment.
|
| Black, J. | Justice (Supreme Court) |
Quoted in concurring opinion in Grunewald v. United States regarding penalties for relying on constitutional privileges.
|
| Taylor | Defendant (Case Law) |
Refers to Commonwealth v. Taylor, a case used as precedent regarding self-incrimination.
|
| Garrity | Party (Case Law) |
Refers to Garrity v. New Jersey.
|
| Boyd | Party (Case Law) |
Refers to Boyd v. United States.
|
| Counselman | Party (Case Law) |
Refers to Counselman v. Hitchcock.
|
| Hitchcock | Party (Case Law) |
Refers to Counselman v. Hitchcock.
|
| Quinn | Party (Case Law) |
Refers to Quinn v. United States.
|
| Grunewald | Party (Case Law) |
Refers to Grunewald v. United States.
|
| Gault | Party (Case Law) |
Refers to Application of Gault.
|
Organizations (4)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| United States District Court |
Implied by case number 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (SDNY)
|
|
| Supreme Court of Pennsylvania |
Implied author of the text citing Commonwealth v. Taylor (Pa. 2020) as 'We recently discussed...'
|
|
| Department of Justice |
Bates stamp DOJ-OGR-00004878
|
|
| U.S. Supreme Court |
Cited via case laws (U.S. Reports citations)
|
Locations (2)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Jurisdiction of the cited case Commonwealth v. Taylor
|
|
|
Mentioned in case citation Garrity v. New Jersey
|
Relationships (2)
Douglas wrote the dissent in Ullmann v. United States.
Key Quotes (4)
"Amendment’s self-incrimination clause 'is not only a protection against conviction and prosecution but a safeguard of conscience and human dignity and freedom of expression as well.'"Source
DOJ-OGR-00004878.jpg
Quote #1
"certain rights, such as those enshrined in the Fifth Amendment, are among those privileges 'whose exercise a State may not condition by the exaction of a price.'"Source
DOJ-OGR-00004878.jpg
Quote #2
"The right against compulsory self-incrimination accompanies a person wherever he goes, no matter the legal proceeding in which he participates, unless and until 'the potential exposure to criminal punishment no longer exists.'"Source
DOJ-OGR-00004878.jpg
Quote #3
"The privilege may, for example, be claimed in a civil or administrative proceeding, if the statement is or may be inculpatory."Source
DOJ-OGR-00004878.jpg
Quote #4
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document