HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031436.jpg

2.89 MB
View Original

Extraction Summary

5
People
4
Organizations
2
Locations
2
Events
3
Relationships
5
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Letter / response to investigation
File Size: 2.89 MB
Summary

This document appears to be a written defense by an academic (likely Lawrence Krauss, based on the specific universities mentioned: Case Western, ASU, and ANU) responding to an investigative report. The author addresses two main issues: a confidential informal resolution regarding a student complaint at Case Western, and a sexual misconduct allegation involving a 'selfie' at a conference in November 2016. The text details that investigations by both ASU and ANU found the selfie allegation not credible, noting that the alleged victim did not file a complaint and the incriminating photo was never produced.

People (5)

Name Role Context
The Author Respondent/Professor
Writing in first person; defending against allegations of misconduct at multiple universities; mentions having a 'hig...
The Student Complainant (Case)
Involved in an interaction at Case Western that led to an informal agreement.
Anonymous Third Party Complainant
Lodged a complaint regarding item #6 (the selfie incident).
Conference Attendee Subject of Alleged Incident
Took a selfie; allegedly touched; did not lodge a formal complaint.
Observer Witness/Reporter
Made the allegations regarding the incident.

Organizations (4)

Name Type Context
Case
Case Western Reserve University; involved in a counter-offer and informal complaint resolution.
ASU
Arizona State University; investigated allegations.
ANU
Australian National University; launched a month-long investigation resulting in temporary suspension and subsequent ...
Human Resources
Department handling the informal complaint.

Timeline (2 events)

November 2016
Incident at a conference involving a 'selfie' photo and alleged unwelcome touching.
Conference (Unspecified location)
Unspecified (Month-long duration)
Investigation by ANU resulting in temporary suspension and eventual clearance.
ANU

Locations (2)

Location Context
Location of the author during the Case Western negotiations.
Implied by ANU context ('hemisphere removed').

Relationships (3)

The Author Employment/Affiliation ASU
References to ASU's response to allegations against the author.
The Author Employment/Affiliation ANU
References to suspension of position at ANU.
The Author Employment/Affiliation Case
References to counter-offer by Case.

Key Quotes (5)

"The University would preserve its confidentiality and remove the complaint from my record after 5 years"
Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031436.jpg
Quote #1
"The complaint was investigated by both ASU and ANU and both came to the conclusion that it was not credible and no university policies had been violated."
Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031436.jpg
Quote #2
"It is the University’s understanding that a complaint was lodged directly to the conference organisers at the time of the incident."
Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031436.jpg
Quote #3
"The complainant alleged that a photo exists, showing your hand on the breast of the conference attendee who took the ‘selfie’ photo."
Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031436.jpg
Quote #4
"This photo was not made available to the Australian National University, although it was requested in the course of the investigation."
Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031436.jpg
Quote #5

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document