HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016544.jpg
3.2 MB
Extraction Summary
7
People
5
Organizations
2
Locations
0
Events
0
Relationships
3
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal exhibit / law review article excerpt
File Size:
3.2 MB
Summary
This document is a page from the Minnesota Law Review (Vol 103), specifically the conclusion of an article discussing prosecutorial discretion, victim rights, and federalism/state jurisdiction. It appears to be an exhibit submitted by attorney David Schoen to the House Oversight Committee, likely to support legal arguments regarding the handling of the Epstein case, specifically concerning the non-prosecution agreement or federal/state jurisdiction issues. The text analyzes the differences between U.S. and foreign legal systems regarding the ability of victims to challenge decisions not to prosecute.
People (7)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| David Schoen | Attorney |
Name appears at the bottom of the page, indicating he likely submitted this document as an exhibit.
|
| Sack, J. | Judge |
Cited in footnote 160 (dissenting opinion).
|
| Lex Hemphill | Author |
Cited in footnote 160.
|
| Roderick M. Hills, Jr. | Author |
Cited in footnote 162.
|
| Harvey A. Silverglate | Author |
Cited in footnote 162.
|
| Emma Quinn-Judge | Author |
Cited in footnote 162.
|
| John C. Coffee, Jr. | Author |
Cited in footnote 162.
|
Organizations (5)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Minnesota Law Review |
Source publication of the text.
|
|
| United States Supreme Court |
Referenced in text regarding the 'Gamble' decision and various case citations.
|
|
| House Oversight Committee |
Implied by the Bates stamp 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT'.
|
|
| Second Circuit Court of Appeals |
Cited as '2d Cir.' in footnote 160.
|
|
| New York Times |
Cited as publication source in footnote 160.
|
Locations (2)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
General context of the legal system discussed.
|
|
|
Mentioned for comparison regarding victim rights legislation.
|
Key Quotes (3)
"All justice systems suffer from pockets of unjustified, even pernicious, underenforcement."Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016544.jpg
Quote #1
"Victim rights reforms in general manifest a judgment that modern criminal justice had focused excessively on public interests and unduly neglected victims' private interests in criminal prosecutions."Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016544.jpg
Quote #2
"Even against the potent political power of victims' rights movements, unfettered executive charging discretion has proven immutable."Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016544.jpg
Quote #3
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document