DOJ-OGR-00001627.jpg
768 KB
Extraction Summary
11
People
4
Organizations
3
Locations
1
Events
1
Relationships
4
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Court filing (legal brief/memorandum)
File Size:
768 KB
Summary
This document is page 17 of a court filing (Document 22) in Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell), filed on July 13, 2020. The text argues against granting bail, citing an 'extraordinary risk of flight' and rejecting the defendant's claim that detention at the MDC prevents adequate preparation for defense. The filing cites numerous precedents (Tolentino, Adamu, Brito, etc.) where bail was denied despite access-to-counsel restrictions, distinguishing the current case from *United States v. Stephens*.
People (11)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| The Defendant | Defendant |
Subject of the bail hearing, referred to as 'her', facing 'extraordinary risk of flight'. (Contextually Ghislaine Max...
|
| AJN | Judge |
Presiding Judge identified in case number 1:20-cr-00330-AJN (Alison J. Nathan).
|
| Tolentino | Defendant (Case Law) |
Cited in United States v. Tolentino regarding bail denial.
|
| Adamu | Defendant (Case Law) |
Cited in United States v. Adamu regarding bail denial.
|
| Brito | Defendant (Case Law) |
Cited in United States v. Brito regarding bail denial.
|
| Ellison | Defendant (Case Law) |
Cited in United States v. Ellison regarding bail denial.
|
| Melamed | Defendant (Case Law) |
Cited in United States v. Melamed regarding bail denial.
|
| Pena | Defendant (Case Law) |
Cited in United States v. Pena regarding bail denial.
|
| Shipp | Defendant (Case Law) |
Cited in United States v. Shipp regarding bail denial.
|
| Stephens | Defendant (Case Law) |
Cited in United States v. Stephens where bail was granted for a specific hearing.
|
| Gonzalez | Defendant (Case Law) |
Cited in United States v. Gonzalez.
|
Timeline (1 events)
Locations (3)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Jurisdiction where the case is being heard
|
|
|
Neighboring jurisdiction cited for case law
|
|
|
Detention center where access to counsel is discussed
|
Relationships (1)
Defendant is applying for bail; Court is reviewing arguments.
Key Quotes (4)
"The defendant’s argument that bail is required for her to prepare her defense is equally unpersuasive."Source
DOJ-OGR-00001627.jpg
Quote #1
"Judges in this district have repeatedly held that the current restrictions on inmate access to counsel do not warrant releasing defendants who should otherwise be detained under the Bail Reform Act."Source
DOJ-OGR-00001627.jpg
Quote #2
"This Court should reach the same conclusion based on the extraordinary risk of flight described in detail above."Source
DOJ-OGR-00001627.jpg
Quote #3
"By contrast, no evidentiary hearings have been requested, much less scheduled, in this case, and a trial date has not yet been set."Source
DOJ-OGR-00001627.jpg
Quote #4
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document