| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Legal proceeding | The Court in the Stephens case found that the inability to prepare a defense required the defenda... | N/A | View |
| 2020-03-19 | N/A | Court decision in United States v. Stephens regarding COVID-19 bail | S.D.N.Y. | View |
| 2020-01-01 | Legal case | Citation for United States v. Stephens, 447 F. Supp. 3d 63. | S.D.N.Y. | View |
| 2019-08-02 | N/A | Legal visits for Jeffrey Epstein. | MCC New York | View |
This document is page 17 of a court filing (Document 22) in Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell), filed on July 13, 2020. The text argues against granting bail, citing an 'extraordinary risk of flight' and rejecting the defendant's claim that detention at the MDC prevents adequate preparation for defense. The filing cites numerous precedents (Tolentino, Adamu, Brito, etc.) where bail was denied despite access-to-counsel restrictions, distinguishing the current case from *United States v. Stephens*.
This legal document argues for the release of Ms. Maxwell from detention, citing the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on her ability to prepare her defense. The filing references the 'Stephens' case as a precedent, emphasizing that the BOP's suspension of in-person visits prevents Ms. Maxwell from having the necessary meetings with her counsel for a case involving events from twenty-five years ago.
This is page 10 of a legal filing from July 10, 2020, in the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The text argues for release or specific detention conditions based on the high risk of COVID-19 in prisons, citing statistics and prior court rulings. It specifically notes that Maxwell was transferred to the Metropolitan Detention Center (MDC) by the BOP on July 6, 2020.
This is page 9 of a legal filing (Document 18) dated July 10, 2020, in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The defense argues that Maxwell should be released on bail because the government failed to prove she is a flight risk and because the COVID-19 pandemic poses a significant health risk to her in detention, citing the precedent of United States v. Stephens. The document also highlights that detention would hinder her ability to prepare a defense due to restrictions on attorney access.
This document is page 4 (labeled 'iii') of a legal filing, specifically a Table of Authorities listing case law citations. It was filed on July 10, 2020, in Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN (the criminal case against Ghislaine Maxwell). The page lists various legal precedents cited in the brief, including 'United States v. Epstein' (2019) and 'United States v. Kashoggi', referencing rulings from the S.D.N.Y., 2nd Circuit, and other jurisdictions regarding bail or detention issues (inferred from the statute 18 U.S.C. § 3142).
This is the conclusion page (page 24) of a legal filing dated April 12, 2021, submitted by the Southern District of New York (Assistant US Attorneys Pomerantz, Comey, and Moe). The document argues that Judge Nathan acted correctly in denying Ghislaine Maxwell's motion for temporary release and concludes that the motion should remain denied.
This document is a "Table of Authorities" from a legal filing, specifically page iii of a larger document. It lists thirteen federal court cases, providing their full citations, the dates of the decisions, and the page numbers within the filing where each case is referenced. All listed cases feature the United States as a party.
This document is a page from a court transcript dated April 1, 2021, concerning United States v. Maxwell. The judge is ruling against Ms. Maxwell's motion for release, stating that unlike other cases, she has not argued specific health vulnerabilities to COVID-19. The court also rejects the argument that prison restrictions at the MDC prevent her from preparing her defense, noting the case is in early stages.
This document is a court transcript from April 1, 2021, in which an attorney, Mr. Cohen, argues that his client's detention has limited his access to her, making it difficult to gather financial information. He contends it is unreasonable for Pretrial Services to expect his client to recall details of a real estate transaction offhand, citing complications from the COVID crisis and legal precedents. Mr. Cohen also informs the court that the government requires until November to complete discovery.
This document is page 12 of a legal filing (Document 18, filed July 10, 2020) in the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. Defense counsel argues for Maxwell's release on bail, citing the inability to effectively communicate with her due to MDC's COVID-19 protocols, which restrict in-person visits and delay phone calls. The text details a specific incident on July 6, 2020, where counsel struggled to connect with Maxwell to comply with a court order, and footnotes cite legal precedents where other defendants were released due to similar pandemic-related restrictions.
This document is a page from a legal filing arguing for the release of Ms. Maxwell, citing increased COVID-19 risks in prisons and the inability to adequately prepare a defense while detained. The text references the 'Stephens' case as a precedent where a defendant was released under 18 U.S.C. § 3142(i) because prison lockdowns prevented necessary legal preparation.
This document is a 'Table of Authorities' page (page iii) from a legal filing (Document 18) in the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN), filed on July 10, 2020. It lists various legal precedents cited in the brief, including 'United States v. Epstein' (2019) and several other cases regarding bail and detention, referencing 18 U.S.C. § 3142.
This legal document, part of a court filing, argues that the pretrial detention conditions for a defendant, Ms. Maxwell, are 'untenable' and prevent her from adequately preparing for trial. The filing cites legal precedents, including United States v. Jackson and United States v. Melendez-Carrions, to assert that prolonged pretrial detention under such circumstances constitutes unconstitutional punishment and violates due process.
This page from a legal filing (dated April 1, 2021) argues for the temporary release of a defendant (likely Ghislaine Maxwell, based on the case number context) by citing legal precedents established during the COVID-19 pandemic. It references *United States v. Clark* and *United States v. Robertson* to establish that courts have granted release under 18 U.S.C. § 3142(i) when incarceration impedes the defendant's ability to prepare their defense. A footnote notes that the 10th Circuit stayed the release order in the *Robertson* case pending appeal.
This document appears to be page 15 (internal numbering) of a legal brief filed on April 1, 2021, in Case 21-770 (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell appeal). The text presents legal arguments against pre-trial detention, citing precedents such as *United States v. Stephens* and *United States v. Weigand* to argue that the COVID-19 pandemic creates obstacles to defense preparation that justify release. It specifically references a case where a 'wealthy defendant' deemed a flight risk was released due to the pandemic.
This document is page 4 of a court filing (Document 97) from the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (1:20-cr-00330-AJN), filed on December 14, 2020. It is a 'Table of Authorities' listing various legal precedents (United States v. Boustani, Bradshaw, Chen, etc.) cited elsewhere in the filing. The page is numbered 'iii' and bears the Bates stamp DOJ-OGR-00001976.
This legal document argues that the risks of COVID-19 to inmates in correctional facilities have significantly increased, citing a doubling of cases and a 73% increase in deaths in the last month. It highlights that the virus is now spreading in the Metropolitan Detention Center (MDC), where Ms. Maxwell was recently transferred by the Bureau of Prisons. The document uses prior court opinions and news reports to support the claim of heightened risk and the inevitability of community spread in such facilities.
This document is page 'iii' (Table of Authorities) from a legal filing in Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). It lists legal precedents cited within the brief, including 'United States v. Epstein' (2019) and 'United States v. Salerno' (1987), along with a citation to 18 U.S.C. § 3142 regarding bail/detention. The page bears a Bates stamp DOJ-OGR-00019878.
This document is a legal argument from a court filing, likely a brief, arguing that the pretrial detention conditions of a defendant, Ms. Maxwell, are untenable and amount to unconstitutional punishment. The author cites several legal precedents (Stephens, Weigand, Jackson, Melendez-Carrions) to support the claim that her inability to properly review discovery and the prolonged nature of her detention violate due process, especially given the government is seeking a life sentence.
This document is page 18 of a legal filing (Case 21-58) dated April 1, 2021. It presents legal arguments for temporary release under 18 U.S.C. § 3142(i), citing the COVID-19 pandemic's impact on a defendant's ability to communicate with counsel and prepare a defense. The text analyzes case precedents *United States v. Clark*, *Stephens*, and *United States v. Robertson*, highlighting that even defendants with serious charges (like Robertson) were released to prepare for trial during the pandemic.
This document is page 38 of a legal filing (filed Jan 21, 2021) arguing for Ghislaine Maxwell's release on bail. The text highlights the difficulties of preparing a defense due to COVID-19 lockdowns at the MDC, citing a spike in cases in early December. The conclusion asserts Maxwell's commitment to fighting the charges, staying in New York, and protecting her sureties, urging the court to grant bail on strict conditions.
A transcript page from a court hearing dated April 1, 2021, likely involving Ghislaine Maxwell (represented by Mr. Cohen). The defense argues that the client's arrest, detention, and the COVID-19 crisis have made it difficult to provide financial information requested by Pretrial Services, specifically regarding a real estate transaction. The text also notes the government requested until November to complete discovery.
A printed copy of a South China Morning Post opinion article dated August 30, 2018, written by Robert Lawrence Kuhn. The article discusses the US-China trade war, suggesting a path toward a 'big deal' through mutual understanding of technological needs and market openness. The document includes a political cartoon depicting Donald Trump and Xi Jinping as babies and bears the Bates stamp HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023690.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity