DOJ-OGR-00005731.jpg
723 KB
Extraction Summary
5
People
3
Organizations
1
Locations
2
Events
2
Relationships
6
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal filing / court document (case 1:20-cr-00330-pae - likely us v. ghislaine maxwell)
File Size:
723 KB
Summary
This legal filing from October 2021 discusses the 2006 investigation into Jeffrey Epstein, highlighting a conflict between the Palm Beach Police (led by Chief Reiter) and state prosecutors regarding the leniency of the prosecution. It notes that while police believed they had probable cause to charge Epstein and two redacted individuals, Ghislaine Maxwell was not named in charging documents. The document also raises serious issues regarding the chain of custody of evidence, stating that Detective Recarey is dead and that the FBI allegedly received empty evidence packages.
People (5)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Jeffrey Epstein | Suspect |
Detectives believed they had probable cause to charge him in 2006; police felt he was not treated harshly enough.
|
| Ghislaine Maxwell | Defendant/Subject |
Referred to as 'Ms. Maxwell'; document notes her name was absent from any charging document or probable cause stateme...
|
| Mr. Reiter | Chief of Police (Palm Beach) |
Wrote letters criticizing the prosecuting attorneys for conflict of interest and delay; referred the matter to the FBI.
|
| Detective Recarey | Detective |
Deceased; his absence makes it impossible to verify chain of custody for seized evidence.
|
| [REDACTED] | Suspects |
Two individuals whose names are redacted, whom detectives believed they had probable cause to charge alongside Epstein.
|
Organizations (3)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Palm Beach Police Department |
Investigating agency; had disagreements with State Attorney; handled evidence.
|
|
| Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) |
Agency the case was referred to by Chief Reiter; allegedly received empty evidence packages.
|
|
| State Attorney |
Prosecuting authority; accused by police of inaction and conflict of interest.
|
Timeline (2 events)
Locations (1)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Jurisdiction of the Police Department mentioned.
|
Relationships (2)
Reiter wrote letters suggesting prosecutors had a conflict of interest and complained about inaction.
Document contrasts that police had probable cause for Epstein but Maxwell's name was absent from charging documents.
Key Quotes (6)
"According to the police reports, the investigating detectives believed that they had probable cause to charge Jeffrey Epstein, [REDACTED] and [REDACTED]"Source
DOJ-OGR-00005731.jpg
Quote #1
"Ms. Maxwell’s name is absent from any charging document or probable cause statement."Source
DOJ-OGR-00005731.jpg
Quote #2
"I do not feel that justice has been sufficiently served by the indictment that has been issued."Source
DOJ-OGR-00005731.jpg
Quote #3
"Therefore please know that his (sic) matter has been referred to the Federal Bureau of Investigation to determine if violations of federal law have occurred."Source
DOJ-OGR-00005731.jpg
Quote #4
"Detective Recarey is dead, and no record custodian exists that can identify what was (1) seized..."Source
DOJ-OGR-00005731.jpg
Quote #5
"Other documents provided to the defense suggest that when the FBI opened packages that were alleged to have contained evidence nothing was inside"Source
DOJ-OGR-00005731.jpg
Quote #6
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document