DOJ-OGR-00002815.jpg
1.22 MB
Extraction Summary
3
People
5
Organizations
1
Locations
2
Events
2
Relationships
3
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal filing / letter regarding subpoena
File Size:
1.22 MB
Summary
This document is a page from a legal filing arguing against a defendant's subpoena requests, asserting they fail to meet the Nixon standard for admissibility and relevance. The text specifically challenges requests for materials from the Epstein Victim's Compensation Program and communications between the firm BSF and the U.S. Attorney, characterizing them as fishing expeditions or irrelevant work product.
People (3)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Alison J. Nathan | ||
| Jeffrey Epstein | ||
| Ghislaine Maxwell |
Organizations (5)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Epstein Victim’s Compensation Program | ||
| BSF | ||
| U.S. Attorney | ||
| Government | ||
| DOJ |
Timeline (2 events)
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE
Filed 03/26/21
Locations (1)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
Relationships (2)
→
→
→
→
Key Quotes (3)
"the subpoena was not crafted to call for admissible evidence. Rather, it called for the production of the entire investigative file and is accurately described as a fishing expedition."Source
DOJ-OGR-00002815.jpg
Quote #1
"The Defendant cannot merely request every piece of confidential information that BSF submitted to the Program in the hopes that something relevant and admissible turns up."Source
DOJ-OGR-00002815.jpg
Quote #2
"Requests 3 through 5 also seek protected work product."Source
DOJ-OGR-00002815.jpg
Quote #3
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document