DOJ-OGR-00009056.jpg
554 KB
Extraction Summary
4
People
3
Organizations
0
Locations
2
Events
1
Relationships
4
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Court filing (legal memorandum/motion)
File Size:
554 KB
Summary
This is a page from a legal filing in the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE), dated February 24, 2022. The document argues that Juror No. 50 falsely answered questions during jury selection (voir dire) and requests subpoenas for the juror's emails with alleged victims, witnesses, or other jurors.
People (4)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Ms. Maxwell | Defendant |
Argues that Juror No. 50 falsely answered questions and requests subpoenas for discovery.
|
| Juror No. 50 | Juror |
Accused of falsely answering material questions during voir dire; subject of requested subpoenas.
|
| Russell | Litigant |
Mentioned in case citation 'Russell v. United States'.
|
| French | Litigant |
Mentioned in case citation 'United States v. French'.
|
Organizations (3)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| United States District Court |
The court handling Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE.
|
|
| DOJ |
Department of Justice (referenced in footer stamp DOJ-OGR-00009056).
|
|
| 1st Cir. |
First Circuit Court of Appeals (cited in legal precedence).
|
Timeline (2 events)
Relationships (1)
Maxwell accusing Juror of misconduct and requesting subpoenas against them.
Key Quotes (4)
"Ms. Maxwell does not believe an evidentiary hearing is required because the undisputed evidence shows (1) that Juror No. 50 falsely answered a material question during voir dire"Source
DOJ-OGR-00009056.jpg
Quote #1
"If this Court disagrees, however, a formal evidentiary hearing is appropriate."Source
DOJ-OGR-00009056.jpg
Quote #2
"an unflagging duty falls to the district court to investigate the claim."Source
DOJ-OGR-00009056.jpg
Quote #3
"[A] formal evidentiary hearing [is] the gold standard for an inquiry into alleged juror misconduct."Source
DOJ-OGR-00009056.jpg
Quote #4
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document