DOJ-OGR-00002885.jpg
855 KB
Extraction Summary
5
People
3
Organizations
0
Locations
3
Events
2
Relationships
4
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal motion/filing (defense letter)
File Size:
855 KB
Summary
This document is page 2 of a legal filing from the Law Offices of Bobbi C. Sternheim, dated March 31, 2021, regarding the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The defense argues that any delay in the trial schedule is the fault of the government for filing a late superseding indictment despite previous assurances (cited from a July 14, 2020 transcript) that they did not anticipate doing so. The defense claims this expansion of the case prejudices Maxwell, prolongs her detention, and transforms the proceedings from a 'two-week' trial into a much longer affair.
People (5)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Ms. Maxwell | Defendant |
Subject of the trial; defense argues against prolonged detention.
|
| Bobbi C. Sternheim | Defense Attorney |
Author of the document (Letterhead).
|
| Ms. Moe | Prosecutor (Government) |
Quoted from transcript stating the government did not anticipate a superseding indictment.
|
| Mr. Cohen | Defense Attorney |
Mentioned in transcript as making representations regarding the schedule.
|
| The Court | Judge/Judiciary |
Inquired about potential superseding indictments.
|
Organizations (3)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Law Offices of Bobbi C. Sternheim |
Letterhead organization.
|
|
| The Government |
Accused of tactical delays and filing late superseding indictments.
|
|
| DOJ |
Referenced in footer bates stamp.
|
Timeline (3 events)
Relationships (2)
Document is from Sternheim's office defending Maxwell.
Ms. Moe speaks on behalf of the government in the transcript.
Key Quotes (4)
"To be clear, any such request will not be made from any desire of Ms. Maxwell to delay her trial but rests squarely on the government’s late, tactical, expansion of this prosecution."Source
DOJ-OGR-00002885.jpg
Quote #1
"MS. MOE: Your Honor, our investigation remains ongoing, but at this point we do not currently anticipate seeking a superseding indictment."Source
DOJ-OGR-00002885.jpg
Quote #2
"The government has unilaterally destroyed the possibility that this case can be completed in the time allotted."Source
DOJ-OGR-00002885.jpg
Quote #3
"The timing suggests that the decision to supersede was prompted by the filing of defense pretrial motions and government concern about the now-apparent weakness of its case."Source
DOJ-OGR-00002885.jpg
Quote #4
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document